IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v85y2026ics1062940826000835.html

A study on the impact of different types of economic policy uncertainty in the United States on volatility and correlation in the global crude oil market

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Jingwen
  • Pan, Yuhan
  • Cao, Guangxi
  • Ling, Meijun
  • Ke, Zhicheng

Abstract

This research utilizes the GARCH-MIDAS-X (GM) and DCC-MIDAS-X (DM) models, including their asymmetric extensions (AGM and ADM), to conduct a comparative analysis of how various forms of U.S. economic policy uncertainty (EPU) affect the volatilities of futures and spot markets, as well as the correlations among three crude oil markets. The findings reveal the following: (1) Among the different types of EPU, only trade policy and government spending policy uncertainties significantly influence the volatilities of futures and spot returns across all petroleum markets. Trade policy uncertainty exerts a stronger negative effect, while government spending policy uncertainty has a milder positive impact. Furthermore, within the same market, there is heterogeneity in the response of futures and spot prices to different types of EPU. The WTI futures market is influenced by fewer types of EPU indices compared to the WTI spot. (2) Government spending, fiscal, regulation, and health care policy uncertainties primarily drive abnormal negative effects on crude oil return volatilities through positive shocks. Conversely, trade policy uncertainty tends to produce positive effects via negative shocks. (3) Except for government spending and financial regulation policy uncertainties, other forms of EPU significantly enhance the correlations between futures and spot prices in Brent and Oman. Additionally, most EPU indices display asymmetric effects on the correlations between futures and spot returns in WTI and Brent, though these asymmetries are less prominent in the Oman market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Jingwen & Pan, Yuhan & Cao, Guangxi & Ling, Meijun & Ke, Zhicheng, 2026. "A study on the impact of different types of economic policy uncertainty in the United States on volatility and correlation in the global crude oil market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s1062940826000835
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2026.102661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940826000835
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2026.102661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:85:y:2026:i:c:s1062940826000835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.