IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v84y2026ics1062940826000513.html

Technological heterogeneity and the asymmetric volume–return relationship in the crypto-asset market

Author

Listed:
  • Zięba, Damian

Abstract

This study examines the asymmetric, heterogeneous, and time-varying relationship between trading volume and returns in the crypto-asset market, with particular attention to the role of technological development. The analysis covers the period 2015–2023 and distinguishes three technological categories of assets—cryptocurrencies, smart-contract platforms, and decentralised applications (dApps)—alongside four subsamples that differ in their technological composition as the market evolves. This structure makes it possible to assess both cross-sectional heterogeneity and changes over time associated with major speculative cycles. Two complementary panel estimators are employed. The panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) estimator provides precise short-run coefficients under contemporaneous correlation, while the heterogeneous ARDL–CCE–MG model allows the short- and long-run dynamics to vary across assets and accounts for unobserved common factors. The results are highly consistent across methods. First, the volume–return relationship exhibits a pronounced asymmetry: positive returns generate markedly stronger trading responses than negative ones. Second, the strength and direction of these effects differ across technological groups, reflecting the diverse economic roles of the assets. Third, the relationship changes substantially over time. During the 2017 and 2021 bubble episodes, volume–return effects converge across groups, while in calmer periods they diverge, especially between cryptocurrencies and more technologically advanced assets. Overall, the evidence indicates that technological progress in the crypto-asset ecosystem contributes to more stable volume–return dynamics and greater investor confidence, particularly among assets that play an infrastructural role. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing asset categories and market phases when analysing short-run crypto-asset behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Zięba, Damian, 2026. "Technological heterogeneity and the asymmetric volume–return relationship in the crypto-asset market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s1062940826000513
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2026.102629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940826000513
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2026.102629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:84:y:2026:i:c:s1062940826000513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.