IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v83y2026ics1062940826000021.html

Sustainability disclosure and bank liquidity risk: evidence from global banking sector

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Jianjin
  • Hsieh, Song-Lin(Sony)
  • Wang, Jia

Abstract

We examine whether sustainability disclosure mitigates banks’ liquidity risk using an international panel of 640 listed banks from 52 countries over 2008–2023. Liquidity risk is a core yet understudied stability dimension in the ESG–banking literature, despite its critical role in financial resilience. Employing a dynamic difference GMM estimator, propensity score matching, and a multi-period difference-in-differences design exploiting staggered ESG disclosure regulations, we find that higher sustainability disclosure significantly reduces banks’ liquidity risk. This effect is economically meaningful and robust across alternative liquidity measures and extensive sensitivity tests. Decomposing ESG into its components, we show that environmental and social disclosures drive the reduction in liquidity risk, whereas governance disclosure has no discernible effect. The impact is stronger for larger banks and in jurisdictions with voluntary rather than mandatory disclosure regimes, consistent with signaling and credibility theories of voluntary reporting. Our results highlight a novel risk channel through which ESG disclosure influences bank stability, offering actionable insights for bank managers and regulators seeking to enhance liquidity resilience through disclosure policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Jianjin & Hsieh, Song-Lin(Sony) & Wang, Jia, 2026. "Sustainability disclosure and bank liquidity risk: evidence from global banking sector," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:83:y:2026:i:c:s1062940826000021
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2026.102582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940826000021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2026.102582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:83:y:2026:i:c:s1062940826000021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.