IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecofin/v82y2026ics1062940825002177.html

Bank systemic risk prediction based on text mining and explainable machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Pucong
  • Borjigin, Sumuya

Abstract

This study utilizes textual data from The Wall Street Journal, employing 12 machine learning models to forecast systemic risk in the US banking sector. Then, this paper applies the SHAP method to interpret the prediction results. The empirical conclusions are as follows: Firstly, in terms of time series forecasting, deep learning models exhibit the best performance, tree models demonstrate moderate predictive efficacy, while linear models perform poorly in predictions. Secondly, there is a positive correlation between SHAP values and banking systemic risk, this conclusion fills the previous research gap. Further research reveals that Topic_29 consistently ranks at the top in feature importance across various time windows. Its keywords (interest rate, bank, stock, company, inflation, rate cut, China) suggest that interest rate policies, corporate operations, inflation control, and geoeconomic factors play pivotal roles in systemic risk. Additionally, the study observes a negative correlation between news sentiment and SHAP values; negative sentiment has a stronger impact and a longer duration. Finally, this study links the topic keywords back to the original news texts to elucidate the impact of news on systemic risk across different sliding window periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Pucong & Borjigin, Sumuya, 2026. "Bank systemic risk prediction based on text mining and explainable machine learning," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:82:y:2026:i:c:s1062940825002177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2025.102577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825002177
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.najef.2025.102577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:82:y:2026:i:c:s1062940825002177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620163 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.