Author
Listed:
- Leifeld, Philip
- Wong, Jackie Siaw Tze
Abstract
Relational event models (REMs) can infer the generative properties of longitudinally observed social networks with instantaneous edges. They assume conditional independence of edges given sufficient network statistics formed over the past event sequence. A popular specification in REMs is to subject these statistics to exponential temporal decay with a fixed half-life parameter to attribute higher importance to more recent edge events in the formation of network statistics. Assuming a fixed half-life parameter may cause biased estimates and obfuscates the temporal horizon over which network effects operate in empirical social systems. These limitations are addressed by proposing fully Bayesian estimation of REMs and designating the half-life parameter as an estimable quantity. A “pre-computation” strategy is devised to speed up calculations for practical feasibility of the sampling procedure. The approach is adapted to discourse network analysis, which models political actors’ statements about their preferred policy beliefs as dynamic networks. An application to the policy debate on reforming the German public pension system illustrates how temporal decay for inertia, actor activity, belief popularity, and actor homophily can be estimated alongside the main coefficients. Convergence diagnostics and an illustration of bias correction relative to fixed parameters are provided, stabilisation using hyper-parameters and computational complexity are discussed, and the approach is extended to include both Breslow’s and Efron’s methods for breaking ties in the event sequence.
Suggested Citation
Leifeld, Philip & Wong, Jackie Siaw Tze, 2026.
"Fully Bayesian estimation of temporal decay in ordinal relational event models,"
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:csdana:v:224:y:2026:i:c:s0167947326000976
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2026.108428
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:224:y:2026:i:c:s0167947326000976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.