IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v218y2026ics0167947325001987.html

Pure error REML for analyzing data from multi-stratum designs

Author

Listed:
  • Gilmour, Steven G.
  • Goos, Peter
  • Großmann, Heiko

Abstract

Since the dawn of response surface methodology, it has been recommended that designs include replicate points, so that pure error estimates of variance can be obtained and used to provide reliable estimated standard errors of the effects of factors. In designs with more than one stratum, such as split-plot and split-split-plot designs, it is less obvious how pure error estimates of the variance components should be obtained, and no pure error estimates are given by the popular residual maximum likelihood (REML) method of estimation. A method of pure error REML estimation of the variance components, using the full treatment model, is obtained by treating each combination of factor levels as a discrete treatment. This method is easy to implement using standard software and improved estimated standard errors of the fixed effects estimates can be obtained by applying the Kenward-Roger correction based on the pure error REML estimates. The new method is illustrated using several data sets and the performance of pure error REML is compared with the standard REML method. The results are comparable when the assumed response surface model is correct, but the new method is considerably more robust in the case of model misspecification.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilmour, Steven G. & Goos, Peter & Großmann, Heiko, 2026. "Pure error REML for analyzing data from multi-stratum designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:218:y:2026:i:c:s0167947325001987
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2025.108322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947325001987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2025.108322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:218:y:2026:i:c:s0167947325001987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.