IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v211y2025ics0167947325001033.html

Distributed iterative hard thresholding for variable selection in Tobit models

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Changxin
  • Zhu, Zhongyi
  • Lin, Hongmei
  • Fan, Zengyan
  • Lian, Heng

Abstract

While there is a substantial body of research on high-dimensional regression with left-censored responses, few methods address this problem in a distributed manner. Due to data transmission limitations and privacy concerns, centralizing all data is often impractical, necessitating a method for collaborative learning with distributed data. In this paper, we employ the Iterative Hard Thresholding (IHT) method for the Tobit model to address this challenge, allowing one to directly specify the desired sparsity and offering an alternative estimation and variable selection approach. Theoretical analysis shows that our estimator achieves a nearly minimax-optimal convergence rate using only a few rounds of communication. Its practical performance is evaluated under both the pooled and the distributed setting. The former highlights its competitive estimation efficiency and variable selection performance compared to existing approaches, while the latter demonstrates that the decentralized estimator closely matches the performance of its centralized counterpart. When applied to high-dimensional left-censored HIV viral load data, our method also demonstrates comparable performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Changxin & Zhu, Zhongyi & Lin, Hongmei & Fan, Zengyan & Lian, Heng, 2025. "Distributed iterative hard thresholding for variable selection in Tobit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s0167947325001033
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2025.108227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947325001033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2025.108227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiuqing Zhou & Guoxiang Liu, 2016. "LAD-Lasso variable selection for doubly censored median regression models," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 3658-3667, June.
    2. Patric Müller & Sara Geer, 2016. "Censored linear model in high dimensions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 75-92, March.
    3. Michael I. Jordan & Jason D. Lee & Yun Yang, 2019. "Communication-Efficient Distributed Statistical Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 668-681, April.
    4. Tate Jacobson & Hui Zou, 2024. "High-Dimensional Censored Regression via the Penalized Tobit Likelihood," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 286-297, January.
    5. Olsen, Randall J, 1978. "Note on the Uniqueness of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for the Tobit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(5), pages 1211-1215, September.
    6. Yu Zhang & Jiangli Wang & Weiping Zhang, 2024. "Variable selection and subgroup analysis for high-dimensional censored data," Statistical Theory and Related Fields, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 211-231, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés Langebaek R. & Diego Vásquez E., 2007. "Determinantes de la actividad innovadora en la industria manufacturera colombiana," Borradores de Economia 433, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    2. Xiang, Pengcheng & Zhou, Ling & Tang, Lu, 2024. "Transfer learning via random forests: A one-shot federated approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Jia-Yuan Liang & Yi-Yang Zhou & Rong Jiang, 2026. "Distributed Composite Quantile Regression for High-Dimensional Data," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 36-58, February.
    4. Xingcai Zhou & Zhaoyang Jing & Chao Huang, 2024. "Distributed Bootstrap Simultaneous Inference for High-Dimensional Quantile Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-53, February.
    5. Guangbao Guo & Guoqi Qian & Lu Lin & Wei Shao, 2021. "Parallel inference for big data with the group Bayesian method," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 225-243, February.
    6. Ren, Yimeng & Li, Zhe & Zhu, Xuening & Gao, Yuan & Wang, Hansheng, 2024. "Distributed estimation and inference for spatial autoregression model with large scale networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    7. Fernández-Val, Iván & Weidner, Martin, 2016. "Individual and time effects in nonlinear panel models with large N, T," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 291-312.
    8. Iñaki Mauleón, 1987. "Problemas prácticos en el tratamiento econométrico de datos "cross-section"," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 11(1), pages 41-94, January.
    9. Zhaohan Hou & Wei Ma & Lei Wang, 2023. "Sparse and debiased lasso estimation and inference for high-dimensional composite quantile regression with distributed data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1250, December.
    10. Ying Wu & Garvit Arora & Xuan Mei, 2024. "Using CPI in Loss Given Default Forecasting Models for Commercial Real Estate Portfolio," Papers 2402.15498, arXiv.org.
    11. Wang, Kangning & Li, Shaomin, 2021. "Robust distributed modal regression for massive data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G, 1999. "Bootstrap Testing in Nonlinear Models," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 40(2), pages 487-508, May.
    13. Anna Bykhovskaya & James A. Duffy, 2025. "Estimation of a Dynamic Tobit Model with a Unit Root," Papers 2512.12110, arXiv.org.
    14. Leandro M. Magnusson, 2008. "Tests in Censored Models when the Structural Parameters Are Not Identified," Working Papers 0802, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    15. Audun Langørgen & Dag Rønningen, 2004. "Local government preferences, individual needs, and the allocation of social assistance," Discussion Papers 380, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    16. Daniel Grodzicki & Alexei Alexandrov & Özlem Bedre-Defolie & Sergei Koulayev, 2023. "Consumer Demand for Credit Card Services," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 63(3), pages 273-311, June.
    17. Qu, Xi & Lee, Lung-fei, 2013. "Locally most powerful tests for spatial interactions in the simultaneous SAR Tobit model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 307-321.
    18. Benny Ren & Ian Barnett, 2022. "Autoregressive mixture models for clustering time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(6), pages 918-937, November.
    19. Lu Lin & Feng Li, 2023. "Global debiased DC estimations for biased estimators via pro forma regression," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(2), pages 726-758, June.
    20. Caio Waisman & Harikesh S. Nair & Carlos Carrion, 2025. "Online Causal Inference for Advertising in Real-Time Bidding Auctions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 176-195, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:211:y:2025:i:c:s0167947325001033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.