IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v209y2026ip2s0960077926006880.html

Homeostatic mechanisms in biological systems: Case studies in modeling copper regulation and self-immune recognition

Author

Listed:
  • de Andrade, Pedro P.A. Cardoso
  • Madeira, João L.O.
  • Antoneli, Fernando

Abstract

In this paper we investigate homeostatic mechanisms in two biologically motivated models: intracellular copper regulation and self immune recognition. The analysis is based on the notion of infinitesimal homeostasis for systems of ordinary differential equations and the formalism of input–output networks. We show that, unlike the examples of Reed et al. (2017), the obstruction of occurrence of infinitesimal homeostasis in both examples is due to the functional form of the differential equations being to far from the ‘generic form’. More specifically, from a ‘generic’ or ‘model-independent’ point of view the models are expected to exhibit infinitesimal homeostasis, but due to functional form of the differential equations, forced by the modeling assumptions used to define the models, some of the ‘expected generic behaviors’ cannot occur. We first analyze both models from the ‘model-independent’ point of view and then show that in the specific models some ‘expected generic behavior’ cannot occur. We illustrate these phenomena with numerical simulations and give rigorous arguments in some cases.

Suggested Citation

  • de Andrade, Pedro P.A. Cardoso & Madeira, João L.O. & Antoneli, Fernando, 2026. "Homeostatic mechanisms in biological systems: Case studies in modeling copper regulation and self-immune recognition," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 209(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:209:y:2026:i:p2:s0960077926006880
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077926006880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:209:y:2026:i:p2:s0960077926006880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.