IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v208y2026ip1s0960077926003048.html

A systematic comparative analysis of modeling methods and variable-dependent weight optimization strategy for PINNs

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Jie
  • Peng, Jing
  • Ramzan, Yasir
  • Tang, Sanyi
  • Lou, Jie

Abstract

Dengue fever is a mosquito-borne infectious disease that poses a significant threat to public health and safety. It is crucial to establish the most appropriate mathematical model and estimate the most reliable parameters to simulate the epidemic and quantify control measures. Therefore, an ODE model, a FDE model and a discrete model are constructed. Three parameter estimation methods (PINNs/fPINNs/Euler-PINNs) are applied to three models (ODE/FDE/discrete), respectively, with data in Singapore. Specifically, a variable-dependent weight optimization strategy (VDWOS) for the inverse problem is newly proposed in this paper, which is compared with the traditional weight optimization strategy (TWOS). For theoretical analysis, there are essential differences: when the endemic equilibrium of the ODE/FDE model is globally asymptotically stable, the discrete model may exhibit a flip bifurcation, resulting in a disruption of stability. For numerical simulation, by comparing TWOS and VDWOS for three models, VDWOS yields more reliable parameters and time-varying parameter β(t) without specific function assumptions. Furthermore, an LSTM network is applied to predict β(t) obtained by VDWOS, and the prediction solution is highly consistent with the test data. Meanwhile, through sensitivity analysis, the model-based numerical reconstruction solution exhibits significant responsiveness, which neural networks cannot achieve. However, the ODE model and the discrete model exhibit a high degree of consistency in their specific numerical conclusions, while the FDE model yields significantly different results. This study provides valuable insights into the crucial issue of model selection in the fields of infectious disease prediction and early warning, pest control, and tumor treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Jie & Peng, Jing & Ramzan, Yasir & Tang, Sanyi & Lou, Jie, 2026. "A systematic comparative analysis of modeling methods and variable-dependent weight optimization strategy for PINNs," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 208(P1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:208:y:2026:i:p1:s0960077926003048
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077926003048
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:208:y:2026:i:p1:s0960077926003048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.