IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v207y2026ics0960077926001475.html

Research on conflict analysis and prediction of unsignalized intersections based on multiple alternative safety measures

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Jiafu
  • Wang, Ting
  • Cheng, Rongjun

Abstract

Unsignalized intersections, due to the frequent interactions between traffic participants, have become high-risk areas for road safety management. In recent years, the continued growth in the number of non-motorized vehicles (NMV), particularly those on electric vehicles, has exacerbated safety issues on these roads. This study, focusing on a typical unsignalized intersection, used drone aerial photography to capture high-angle video data. Combined with computer vision-based trajectory extraction techniques, the study employed multiple alternative safety metrics to quantitatively assess traffic conflicts at the intersection. Subsequently, the machine learning-based traffic conflict prediction model was constructed using the identified conflict events as a sample. The results showed that potential conflicts were primarily concentrated at intersection entrances and exits, with right-turn exits being the most frequent. The conflict risk and severity of non-motor vehicles interacting with motor vehicles were significantly higher than those of other traffic participants, and the rate of both parties yielding in high-risk situations was lower. Among the five prediction models, XGBoost performed best in terms of accuracy (83.6%), precision, and generalization performance. These results demonstrate that the conflict identification framework based on drone video and machine learning can effectively support proactive safety assessments at unsignalized intersections, providing data support for traffic management departments to formulate safety interventions and optimize road infrastructure design.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Jiafu & Wang, Ting & Cheng, Rongjun, 2026. "Research on conflict analysis and prediction of unsignalized intersections based on multiple alternative safety measures," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:207:y:2026:i:c:s0960077926001475
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077926001475
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:207:y:2026:i:c:s0960077926001475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.