IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v205y2026ics0960077925018594.html

How subgroups affect the power law governing pedestrian avoidance interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Ge, Jingwei
  • Wu, Wenhan

Abstract

Pedestrian motion, driven by continuous interactions that govern individual navigation and collective behavior, is crucial for understanding and managing complex crowd dynamics in urban public spaces. However, most existing studies treat pedestrians as isolated individuals, overlooking how subgroup organization affects collision avoidance and interaction laws. To address this, we develop a subgroup-aware framework to capture the most imminent subgroup-involved encounter by minimizing pairwise Time-To-Collision (TTC) within subgroups, thereby filtering redundant interactions and prioritizing behavioral realism. This data-driven analysis, applied to five public pedestrian datasets, examines the pair distribution function and interaction energy, showing that subgroup consideration yields a systematically smaller power-law exponent than the independent-individual assumption, revealing a weaker but more focused interaction decay. Moreover, the scaling exponent increases with subgroup size, indicating amplified repulsive forces and sharper avoidance maneuvers when facing larger subgroups. As an empirical feature-discovery study, these findings provide a more realistic and behaviorally grounded basis for modeling pedestrian dynamics, offering valuable implications for crowd simulation, public-space design, and autonomous systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge, Jingwei & Wu, Wenhan, 2026. "How subgroups affect the power law governing pedestrian avoidance interactions," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0960077925018594
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925018594
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0960077925018594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.