IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v204y2026ics0960077925017424.html

Neighborhood centroid opposition-based flood algorithm for optimizing fractional-order PID control in nonlinear heat exchanger dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Izci, Davut
  • Eker, Erdal
  • Ekinci, Serdar
  • Bajaj, Mohit
  • Blazek, Vojtech
  • Prokop, Lukas

Abstract

This study presents a novel neighborhood centroid opposition-based flood algorithm (NCO-FLA) for optimizing fractional-order proportional-integral-derivative (FOPID) controllers aimed at precise temperature regulation in nonlinear shell-and-tube heat exchanger systems. By integrating opposition-based learning (OBL) and neighborhood centroid mechanisms into the conventional flood algorithm (FLA), the proposed NCO-FLA significantly improves global search efficiency and mitigates premature convergence in high-dimensional parameter spaces. The FOPID controller, with its five tunable parameters, provides a more flexible and robust framework than traditional PID structures, especially under nonlinear and dynamic conditions commonly encountered in industrial heat exchange processes. Extensive simulations conducted in MATLAB/Simulink demonstrate that NCO-FLA outperforms benchmark metaheuristic algorithms, including the marine predators algorithm (MPA), reptile search algorithm (RSA), catch fish optimization algorithm (CFOA), and the original FLA as well as classical algorithms such as differential evolution (DE), particle swarm optimization (PSO), evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES), DE variants with linear population size reduction (L-SHADE) and NCO-PSO. Quantitative results show that he proposed NCO-FLA achieved 10–15 % lower ITAE values compared to the other optimizers, confirming its enhanced control accuracy and convergence stability. The proposed NCO-FLA also exhibited a smoother and faster convergence trend compared to other algorithms, as confirmed by the convergence profiles, and achieved the lowest standard deviation (0.9183), indicating superior consistency and reliability. Additionally, the NCO-FLA-tuned FOPID controller achieves zero overshoot, near-zero steady-state error, and significantly shorter rise (5.16 s) and settling times (19.05 s). Statistical significance was confirmed through Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as well as Mann-Whitney U test where all p-values were below 0.05, affirming the superiority and robustness of the proposed method. These findings underscore the algorithm's strong potential for real-world deployment in complex thermal systems where high accuracy, stability, and adaptive control are critical. The proposed NCO-FLA represents a promising advancement in metaheuristic optimization for industrial control systems. Future work will focus on integrating the algorithm with machine learning models and evaluating its performance in large-scale, real-time environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Izci, Davut & Eker, Erdal & Ekinci, Serdar & Bajaj, Mohit & Blazek, Vojtech & Prokop, Lukas, 2026. "Neighborhood centroid opposition-based flood algorithm for optimizing fractional-order PID control in nonlinear heat exchanger dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0960077925017424
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925017424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shu-Xia Li & Jie-Sheng Wang, 2015. "Dynamic Modeling of Steam Condenser and Design of PI Controller Based on Grey Wolf Optimizer," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-9, December.
    2. Oravec, Juraj & Bakošová, Monika & Trafczynski, Marian & Vasičkaninová, Anna & Mészáros, Alajos & Markowski, Mariusz, 2018. "Robust model predictive control and PID control of shell-and-tube heat exchangers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Sarah A Alzakari & Davut Izci & Serdar Ekinci & Amel Ali Alhussan & Fatma A Hashim, 2024. "Nonlinear FOPID controller design for pressure regulation of steam condenser via improved metaheuristic algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-33, September.
    4. Adeel Ahmad Jamil & Wen Fu Tu & Syed Wajhat Ali & Yacine Terriche & Josep M. Guerrero, 2022. "Fractional-Order PID Controllers for Temperature Control: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    5. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Aghaei, Jamshid & Gitizadeh, Mohsen & Falah, Hasan, 2014. "Application of chaos-based chaotic invasive weed optimization techniques for environmental OPF problems in the power system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 271-284.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah A Alzakari & Davut Izci & Serdar Ekinci & Amel Ali Alhussan & Fatma A Hashim, 2024. "Nonlinear FOPID controller design for pressure regulation of steam condenser via improved metaheuristic algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-33, September.
    2. Çetin, Gürcan & Özkaraca, Osman & Keçebaş, Ali, 2021. "Development of PID based control strategy in maximum exergy efficiency of a geothermal power plant," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Jiří Jaromír Klemeš & Petar Sabev Varbanov & Paweł Ocłoń & Hon Huin Chin, 2019. "Towards Efficient and Clean Process Integration: Utilisation of Renewable Resources and Energy-Saving Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-32, October.
    4. Trafczynski, Marian & Markowski, Mariusz & Urbaniec, Krzysztof, 2019. "Energy saving potential of a simple control strategy for heat exchanger network operation under fouling conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 355-364.
    5. Wan, Xin & Luo, Xiong-Lin, 2020. "Economic optimization of chemical processes based on zone predictive control with redundancy variables," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Brage Rugstad Knudsen & Hanne Kauko & Trond Andresen, 2019. "An Optimal-Control Scheme for Coordinated Surplus-Heat Exchange in Industry Clusters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Mingjun Li & Jiangyang Pan & Yaolai Liu & Yazhou Wang & Wenchuan Zhang & Junxing Wang, 2022. "Dam deformation forecasting using SVM-DEGWO algorithm based on phase space reconstruction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-39, June.
    8. Pavlovičová, E. & Oravec, J. & Trafczynski, M. & Markowski, M. & Alabrudzinski, S. & Kisielewski, P. & Urbaniec, K., 2025. "Energy and carbon footprint reduction for hybrid heat-integrated distillation systems: Robust model predictive control approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    9. Trafczynski, Marian & Markowski, Mariusz & Urbaniec, Krzysztof, 2023. "Energy saving and pollution reduction through optimal scheduling of cleaning actions in a heat exchanger network," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Oravec, Juraj & Horváthová, Michaela & Bakošová, Monika, 2020. "Energy efficient convex-lifting-based robust control of a heat exchanger," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Zhang, Kezhen & Zhao, Yongliang & Liu, Ming & Gao, Lin & Fu, Yue & Yan, Junjie, 2021. "Flexibility enhancement versus thermal efficiency of coal-fired power units during the condensate throttling processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Jalel Ben Hmida & Mohammad Javad Morshed & Jim Lee & Terrence Chambers, 2018. "Hybrid Imperialist Competitive and Grey Wolf Algorithm to Solve Multiobjective Optimal Power Flow with Wind and Solar Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Zhang, Xiaochen & Xu, Kaijie & Liao, Shengchen & Qiu, Lin & Ye, Chengjin & Fang, Youtong, 2025. "Disturbed security-constrained and time-variant optimal power flow for dynamic power system based on chaotic-genetic-centroid puffin optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 397(C).
    14. Seferlis, Panos & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Chin, Hon Huin & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2021. "Sustainable design, integration, and operation for energy high-performance process systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Yuan, Ping & Sun, Jing & Tian, Hua & Zhang, Xuanang & Shu, Gequn, 2025. "An active design method for high-precision heat transfer correlation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    16. Ikram Boucetta & Djemai Naimi & Ahmed Salhi & Saleh Abujarad & Laid Zellouma, 2022. "Power System Stability Enhancement Using a Novel Hybrid Algorithm Based on the Water Cycle Moth-Flame Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Pranta Das & Shuvra Prokash Biswas & Sudipto Mondal & Md Rabiul Islam, 2023. "Frequency Fluctuation Mitigation in a Single-Area Power System Using LQR-Based Proportional Damping Compensator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. J. Alberto Conejero & Jonathan Franceschi & Enric Picó-Marco, 2022. "Fractional vs. Ordinary Control Systems: What Does the Fractional Derivative Provide?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Marcelo Becerra-Rozas & José Lemus-Romani & Felipe Cisternas-Caneo & Broderick Crawford & Ricardo Soto & José García, 2022. "Swarm-Inspired Computing to Solve Binary Optimization Problems: A Backward Q-Learning Binarization Scheme Selector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-30, December.
    20. Salil Madhav Dubey & Hari Mohan Dubey & Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2022. "Modified Quasi-Opposition-Based Grey Wolf Optimization for Mathematical and Electrical Benchmark Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-29, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0960077925017424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.