IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v200y2025ip2s096007792500997x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Q-learning promotes the evolution of fairness and generosity in the ultimatum game

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Binjie
  • Shen, Shaofei
  • Wang, Jiafeng
  • Wan, Haibin

Abstract

The traditional Q-learning algorithm has been widely applied to the study of cooperation in social dilemmas, however, few studies have utilized it in the context of the Ultimatum Game. To address this gap, this paper investigates the evolutionary Ultimatum Game by proposing a strategy-adjustment-based Q-learning algorithm. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we quantitatively confirm the significant influence of sensitivity factors (denoted as βp and βq) on fairness and generosity. Notably, compared to the conventional situation, the introduction of sensitivity factors, especially when βp≫βq, leads to a marked increase in levels of fairness and generosity. Additionally, when βp≪βq, the population gravitates toward empathy-driven strategies, further enhancing fairness. Conversely, we find that when βp and βq are approximately equal, fairness is undermined. These evolutionary dynamics provide deeper insights into the mechanisms underlying fairness and generosity in human behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Binjie & Shen, Shaofei & Wang, Jiafeng & Wan, Haibin, 2025. "Q-learning promotes the evolution of fairness and generosity in the ultimatum game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 200(P2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:200:y:2025:i:p2:s096007792500997x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007792500997X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:200:y:2025:i:p2:s096007792500997x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.