IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v200y2025ip1s0960077925010203.html

Connection-based framework for assessing natural complexity in nonlinear adaptive systems

Author

Listed:
  • Gomes Pacheco, Viviane M.
  • Wainer, Gabriel A.
  • Gomes, Flavio A.
  • Martins, Weber
  • Paiva, Joao Ricardo B.
  • Martins, Marcella Scoczynski R.
  • Rodrigues, Clóves Gonçalves
  • Coimbra, Antonio Paulo
  • Calixto, Wesley Pacheco

Abstract

This study introduces a quantitative framework for assessing natural complexity in adaptive systems, based on connection measures weighted by sensitivity indices. The methodology integrates system modeling, sensitivity analysis, and complexity assessment, enabling continuous monitoring and decision support in dynamic environments. Natural complexity is defined as an optimal level at which the system behaves in accordance with its nature, sustaining coherence between structure and function. By employing sensitivity-weighted connections, the framework captures both internal organization and adaptive dynamics, overcoming limitations of traditional metrics such as Shannon entropy and fractal dimension, which often neglect interaction intensity and temporal variability. The framework is validated through two case studies: a computational model of an Intensive Care Unit and a real-world startup acceleration ecosystem. In the Intensive Care Unit, periods of overload were identified through peaks in complexity, associated with an increased number of highly sensitive parameter connections. In contrast, in the startup ecosystem, systemic idleness was reflected by lower complexity levels, driven by weakly influential interactions among actors. These findings highlight the responsiveness and interpretability of the proposed metric compared to conventional approaches, particularly in tracking adaptive states over time. This connection-based framework supports the management of adaptive information systems, offering a dynamic and scalable complexity assessment tool. Its applicability spans medical informatics, business management, and distributed systems optimization, providing real-time insights that improve resilience and efficiency. In addition, the approach aligns with industry 4.0 paradigms, facilitating preventive analyses and adaptive decision-making in advanced technological environments. By offering a unified methodology for complexity evaluation, this research advances understanding and control of complex adaptive systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gomes Pacheco, Viviane M. & Wainer, Gabriel A. & Gomes, Flavio A. & Martins, Weber & Paiva, Joao Ricardo B. & Martins, Marcella Scoczynski R. & Rodrigues, Clóves Gonçalves & Coimbra, Antonio Paulo & C, 2025. "Connection-based framework for assessing natural complexity in nonlinear adaptive systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 200(P1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:200:y:2025:i:p1:s0960077925010203
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925010203
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viviane M. Gomes & Joao R. B. Paiva & Marcio R. C. Reis & Gabriel A. Wainer & Wesley P. Calixto, 2019. "Mechanism for Measuring System Complexity Applying Sensitivity Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, April.
    2. Ronald L. Iman & Jon C. Helton, 1988. "An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 71-90, March.
    3. Su Yi & Yang Zaoli & Xie Xuemei & Garg Harish, 2022. "Complex System Models and Their Application in Industrial Cluster and Innovation Systems," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    4. MacCormack, Alan & Baldwin, Carliss & Rusnak, John, 2012. "Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1309-1324.
    5. Sobol’, I.M. & Tarantola, S. & Gatelli, D. & Kucherenko, S.S. & Mauntz, W., 2007. "Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 957-960.
    6. Andreas Hieronymi, 2013. "Understanding Systems Science: A Visual and Integrative Approach," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 580-595, September.
    7. Schütz, Alexander & Widjaja, Thomas & Kaiser, Jasmin, 2013. "Complexity in Enterprise Architectures - Conceptualization and Introduction of a Measure from a System Theoretic Perspective," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 61723, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    8. Alexander F. Siegenfeld & Yaneer Bar-Yam, 2020. "An Introduction to Complex Systems Science and Its Applications," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-16, July.
    9. Ana Teixeira de Melo & Leo Simon Dominic Caves & Anna Dewitt & Evie Clutton & Rory Macpherson & Philip Garnett, 2020. "Thinking (in) complexity: (In) definitions and (mis)conceptions," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 154-169, January.
    10. João R. B. Paiva & Alana S. Magalhães & Pedro H. F. Moraes & Júnio S. Bulhões & Wesley P. Calixto, 2021. "Stability Metric Based on Sensitivity Analysis Applied to Electrical Repowering System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Su Yi & Yang Zaoli & Xie Xuemei & Garg Harish, 2022. "Complex System Models and Their Application in Industrial Cluster and Innovation Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-3, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    2. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    3. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    4. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    5. David, Viviane & Joachim, Sandrine & Tebby, Cleo & Porcher, Jean-Marc & Beaudouin, Rémy, 2019. "Modelling population dynamics in mesocosms using an individual-based model coupled to a bioenergetics model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 398(C), pages 55-66.
    6. Sobol' Ilya M. & Shukhman Boris V., 2007. "On Global Sensitivity Indices: Monte Carlo Estimates Affected by Random Errors," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 89-97, April.
    7. Stajić, Ljubiša & Praksová, Renáta & Brkić, Dejan & Praks, Pavel, 2024. "Estimation of global natural gas spot prices using big data and symbolic regression," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0070578 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Medeiros-Sousa, Antônio Ralph & Lange, Martin & Mucci, Luis Filipe & Marrelli, Mauro Toledo & Grimm, Volker, 2024. "Modelling the transmission and spread of yellow fever in forest landscapes with different spatial configurations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    10. Dirk Martignoni & Thomas Keil & Markus Lang, 2020. "Focus in Searching Core–Periphery Structures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 266-286, March.
    11. Deman, G. & Konakli, K. & Sudret, B. & Kerrou, J. & Perrochet, P. & Benabderrahmane, H., 2016. "Using sparse polynomial chaos expansions for the global sensitivity analysis of groundwater lifetime expectancy in a multi-layered hydrogeological model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 156-169.
    12. Turanay Caner & Susan K. Cohen & Frits Pil, 2017. "Firm heterogeneity in complex problem solving: A knowledge-based look at invention," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1791-1811, September.
    13. Lee, Sang-Hee & Park, Cheol-Min, 2022. "The effect of hunter-wild boar interactions and landscape heterogeneity on wild boar population size: A simulation study," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    14. Edouard Dossetto & Christophe Chorro, 2022. "Building a global sensitivity analysis to quantify the robustness of macro-economic models," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-05559166, HAL.
    15. Shabbir Ahmed Osmani & Foysol Mahmud, 2021. "An integrated approach of machine algorithms with multi-objective optimization in performance analysis of event detection," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1976-1993, February.
    16. Viviane M. Gomes & Joao R. B. Paiva & Marcio R. C. Reis & Gabriel A. Wainer & Wesley P. Calixto, 2019. "Mechanism for Measuring System Complexity Applying Sensitivity Analysis," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, April.
    17. Michael A. Zaggl & Arvind Malhotra & Oliver Alexy & Ann Majchrzak, 2023. "Governing crowdsourcing for unconstrained innovation problems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(11), pages 2783-2817, November.
    18. Lechevalier, Sébastien & Nishimura, Junichi & Storz, Cornelia, 2014. "Diversity in patterns of industry evolution: How an intrapreneurial regime contributed to the emergence of the service robot industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1716-1729.
    19. Emanuele Borgonovo & Gordon B. Hazen & Elmar Plischke, 2016. "A Common Rationale for Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Estimation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(10), pages 1871-1895, October.
    20. Kucherenko, S. & Song, S., 2017. "Different numerical estimators for main effect global sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 222-238.
    21. Nicolas A. Menzies & Brian W. Allwood & Anna S. Dean & Pete J. Dodd & Rein M. G. J. Houben & Lyndon P. James & Gwenan M. Knight & Jamilah Meghji & Linh N. Nguyen & Andrea Rachow & Samuel G. Schumacher, 2023. "Global burden of disease due to rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a mathematical modeling analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:200:y:2025:i:p1:s0960077925010203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.