IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v199y2025ip3s0960077925008744.html

The impact of reputation-based dynamic reward mechanism on the evolution of fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Deng, Lili
  • Li, Weiwei
  • Wang, Rugen
  • Wang, Cheng

Abstract

In real life, a positive reputation usually provides individuals with additional benefits. Reward mechanisms within organizations are generally adjusted dynamically in accordance with the actual circumstances of the groups being rewarded. The main purpose of these adjustments is to optimize motivational outcomes while ensuring the most effective use of limited reward resources. Considering this within a small-world networked ultimatum game model, we introduce a reputation-based dynamic reward mechanism, aiming to encourage fairness behaviors within populations. Specifically, each individual has a unique reputation threshold, which is determined by a combination of the average reputation of their neighbors and the overall global reputation. Individuals are rewarded only when their reputations exceed these personalized thresholds. The extent to which an individual’s past reputation is retained over time is governed by a decay factor. Moreover, the reward strength is inversely related to the proportion of individuals who qualify for rewards at any given time. We investigate the dynamic interplay of three key parameters—the weight factor, the decay factor, and the rate of change in reward strength—on the evolution of fairness behaviors. Simulation outcomes show that the reputation-based dynamic reward mechanism significantly promotes the emergence of fairness within population. Specifically, higher values of the weight factor and lower values of the decay factor are found to strongly encourage fair behavior. Additionally, a slower rate of change in reward strength further enhances fairness. These findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of fairness dynamics in social systems and offer practical guidance for designing effective personalized incentive mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Deng, Lili & Li, Weiwei & Wang, Rugen & Wang, Cheng, 2025. "The impact of reputation-based dynamic reward mechanism on the evolution of fairness," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:199:y:2025:i:p3:s0960077925008744
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925008744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xiuli & Wang, Zhonglin & Pang, Yicheng, 2025. "Dynamic asymmetric reflective decision-making supports the evolution of cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P1).
    2. Xu, Zhixiong & Xu, Zhehang & Zhang, Wei & Han, Xiao-Pu & Meng, Fanyuan, 2024. "Memory-based spatial evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Bethwaite, Judy & Tompkinson, Paul, 1996. "The ultimatum game and non-selfish utility functions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 259-271, April.
    4. Wang, Xianjia & Ding, Rui & Zhao, Jinhua & Chen, Wenman & Gu, Cuiling, 2022. "Competition of punishment and reward among inequity-averse individuals in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Deng, Lili & Wang, Hongsi & Wang, Rugen & Xu, Ronghua & Wang, Cheng, 2024. "The adaptive adjustment of node weights based on reputation and memory promotes fairness," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Deng, Lili & Zhang, Xingxing & Wang, Cheng, 2021. "Coevolution of spatial ultimatum game and link weight promotes fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).
    7. Bai, Xi & Ye, Ye & Chen, Tong & Xie, Nenggang, 2024. "The evolutionary game of emotions considering the influence of reputation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    8. Zhao, Yakun & Xiong, Tianyu & Zheng, Lei & Li, Yumeng & Chen, Xiaojie, 2020. "The effect of similarity on the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Cochard, François & Le Gallo, Julie & Georgantzis, Nikolaos & Tisserand, Jean-Christian, 2021. "Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Zhang, Yanling & Yang, Shuo & Chen, Xiaojie & Bai, Yanbing & Xie, Guangming, 2023. "Reputation update of responders efficiently promotes the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Zhang, Yanling & Chen, Xiaojie & Liu, Aizhi & Sun, Changyin, 2018. "The effect of the stake size on the evolution of fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 321(C), pages 641-653.
    12. Quan, Ji & Shi, Yuang & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Effect of fairness-based sympathy and retaliation on cooperation in multi-player dilemma games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    13. Cimpeanu, Theodor & Di Stefano, Alessandro & Perret, Cedric & Han, The Anh, 2023. "Social diversity reduces the complexity and cost of fostering fairness," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Feng, Kehuan & Han, Songlin & Feng, Minyu & Szolnoki, Attila, 2024. "An evolutionary game with reputation-based imitation-mutation dynamics," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    15. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, 2003. "The nature of human altruism," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6960), pages 785-791, October.
    16. Yang, Qianxi & Yang, Yanlong, 2025. "Effects of an update mechanism based on combinatorial memory and high-reputation learning objects on the evolution of cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 495(C).
    17. Kirchsteiger, Georg, 1994. "The role of envy in ultimatum games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 373-389, December.
    18. Deng, Lili & Wang, Rugen & Liao, Ying & Xu, Ronghua & Wang, Cheng, 2025. "The reputation-based reward mechanism promotes the evolution of fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    19. Sun, Xingping & Li, Mingyuan & Kang, Hongwei & Shen, Yong & Chen, Qingyi, 2023. "Combined effect of pure punishment and reward in the public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 445(C).
    20. Hana Krakovská & Rudolf Hanel & Mark Broom, 2025. "Fairness in the multi-proposer-multi-responder ultimatum game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, March.
    21. Zheng, Lei & Li, Youqi & Zhou, Jingsai & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "The effect of celebrity on the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    22. Saptarshi Pal & Christian Hilbe, 2022. "Reputation effects drive the joint evolution of cooperation and social rewarding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Lei & Li, Youqi & Zhou, Jingsai & Li, Yumeng, 2022. "The effect of celebrity on the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    2. Deng, Lili & Wang, Rugen & Liao, Ying & Xu, Ronghua & Wang, Cheng, 2025. "The reputation-based reward mechanism promotes the evolution of fairness," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    3. Deng, Lili & Wang, Hongsi & Wang, Rugen & Xu, Ronghua & Wang, Cheng, 2024. "The adaptive adjustment of node weights based on reputation and memory promotes fairness," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Chen, Xiaoyu & Wu, Chaoxian & Fan, Suohai, 2025. "The dual effect of regret on cooperation in spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1).
    5. Wu, Binjie & Shen, Shaofei & Wang, Jiafeng & Wan, Haibin, 2025. "Q-learning promotes the evolution of fairness and generosity in the ultimatum game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 200(P2).
    6. Deng, Lili & Tang, Wansheng & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2011. "The coevolutionary ultimatum game on different network topologies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(23), pages 4227-4235.
    7. Ding, Rui & Wang, Xianjia & Quan, Ji & Ma, Shuting & Zhao, Jinhua, 2025. "Evolutionary dynamics of spatial public goods games with insurance mechanisms," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Xiaofeng Wang & Xiaojie Chen & Long Wang, 2020. "Evolution of egalitarian social norm by resource management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Sun, Xingping & Zhu, Haoran & Kang, Hongwei & Bi, Yanzheng & Shen, Yong & Chen, Qingyi, 2025. "The impact of memory reputation-induced tax and reward allocation on spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Ding, Rui & Wang, Xianjia & Quan, Ji & Ma, Shuting & Zhao, Jinhua, 2025. "The evolution of cooperation and punishment in spatial public goods games with bribery," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2024. "Supporting punishment via taxation in a structured population," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2024. "Suppressing defection by increasing temptation: The impact of smart cooperators on a social dilemma situation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    13. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2005:i:12:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Shanshan Zhen & Rongjun Yu, 2016. "Tend to Compare and Tend to Be Fair: The Relationship between Social Comparison Sensitivity and Justice Sensitivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Thierry Vignolo, 2005. "When envy helps explain coordination," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(12), pages 1-7.
    16. Lee, Hsuan-Wei & Cleveland, Colin & Szolnoki, Attila, 2023. "Restoring spatial cooperation with myopic agents in a three-strategy social dilemma," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 458(C).
    17. Wang, Weijie & Xu, Zhehang & Hua, Shijia & Cui, Longqing & Zhang, Jianlin & Meng, Fanyuan, 2024. "Threshold-initiated spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Gao, Meng & Li, Zhi & Wu, Te, 2023. "Evolutionary dynamics of friendship-driven reputation strategies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    19. Wang, Jianwei & Xu, Wenshu & Zhang, Xingjian & Zhao, Nianxuan & Yu, Fengyuan, 2023. "Redistribution based on willingness to cooperate promotes cooperation while intensifying equality in heterogeneous populations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    20. Kang, Hongwei & Li, Xin & Shen, Yong & Sun, Xingping & Chen, Qingyi, 2024. "Particle swarm optimization with historical return decay enhances cooperation in public goods games with investment risks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 189(P1).
    21. Wang, Yang & Li, Xinlong & Yao, Jing & Zhang, Wei, 2025. "The evolutionary fairness dynamics on multiplex networks with information reliability and time delays," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:199:y:2025:i:p3:s0960077925008744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.