IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v95y2026ics1043951x25002962.html

Why do Chinese SMEs avoid formal employment? Political connections and unequal access to formalization benefits11Corresponding author is Ketong Zhu. We are grateful to the editors of this special issue and the anonymous referees for their insightful suggestions. We thank Zijun Cheng, Bing Lu, Shuanghe Shang, Wenkai Sun, Zhongwen Zhang, Xiaobo Zhang and participants in 24th China Economics Annual Conference for their valuable feedback. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#72203252, #72342031, and #42293273), the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No. 2462025YJRC029), and the Program for Innovation Research at the Central University of Finance and Economics. We thank the data support from the Center for Enterprise Research of Peking University. The authors are listed alphabetically according to the last names. Authors equally share the first authorship. All errors are ours

Author

Listed:
  • Dai, Ruochen
  • Feng, Yue
  • Liu, Chengfang
  • Li, Langrui
  • Zhang, Lina
  • Zhu, Ketong

Abstract

Employment formalization among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) remains low in developing countries, which weakens job security and social protection. Despite policy efforts, many SMEs evade social insurance obligations, raising concerns about labor rights and economic stability. Using data on 2664 SMEs in the 2018 Enterprise Survey for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in China (ESIEC), we document that 48.4 % of SMEs provide no social insurance, while 74.6 % cover only some employees. After controlling for firm characteristics as well as city and industry fixed effects, SMEs led by politically connected entrepreneurs have a 7.1-percentage-point higher probability of providing social insurance than those without such connections. This correlation likely stems from connected entrepreneurs' preferential access to formalization benefits—including formal credit and government procurement contracts—which collectively generate a political-connection premium that incentivizes compliance with labor regulations. These findings suggest that the uneven distribution of such benefits (concentrated among politically connected firms) contributes to the overall low formalization rates in China's SME sector, as most entrepreneurs lack access to these incentives. Moreover, the political-connection premium diminishes in regions with stronger financial inclusion and lower government intervention, suggesting that an improved business environment encourages broader formalization. These findings underscore the importance of policies that decouple formalization benefits from political connections to foster more inclusive labor protection and economic stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Dai, Ruochen & Feng, Yue & Liu, Chengfang & Li, Langrui & Zhang, Lina & Zhu, Ketong, 2026. "Why do Chinese SMEs avoid formal employment? Political connections and unequal access to formalization benefits11Corresponding author is Ketong Zhu. We are grateful to the editors of this special issue and the anonymous referees for their insightful ," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:95:y:2026:i:c:s1043951x25002962
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25002962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:95:y:2026:i:c:s1043951x25002962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.