IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v92y2025ics1043951x25000859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the wage gap between public and non-public sector in China: Insights from a robust quantile selection model

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Qingquan
  • Zeng, Weihong
  • Yi, Lan

Abstract

This study examines the wage gap between public and non-public sectors, which constitute a key component of overall wage inequality in China. While quantile models are traditionally employed to analyze such wage gaps, their conventional implementations face methodological challenges, particularly in addressing endogeneity issues stemming from restrictive assumptions. Our empirical analysis of China's sectoral wage gap reveals that these conventional models fail to satisfy model specification tests, primarily due to bias introduced by residual terms in regression coefficient predictions. To address these limitations, we employ a robust quantile selection model that mitigates the restrictive assumptions. The results demonstrate a significant public sector wage premium—approximately 25 % on average—with the disparity being most pronounced among low quantiles. The analysis also reveals that previous models' prediction systematically underestimated public sector wage spillovers, and in some cases, mistakenly concluded that public sector wages were lower than those in the non-public sector. A detailed decomposition indicates that observable characteristics can explain over 80 % of the total wage gap in 2018. In comparison, the more extensive implementation of market-oriented reforms in state-owned enterprises corresponds to a reduced wage premium and unexplained portion. Finally, factor analysis identifies returns to human capital, demographic composition changes, and risk preferences emerge as key drivers, while the impact of industrial restructuring appears negligible.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Qingquan & Zeng, Weihong & Yi, Lan, 2025. "Examining the wage gap between public and non-public sector in China: Insights from a robust quantile selection model," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000859
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000859
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.