IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chieco/v92y2025ics1043951x25000847.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income inequality and shadow education in China: From the perspective of social stratification

Author

Listed:
  • Gong, Yuexuan
  • Xue, Haiping
  • Chen, Tao

Abstract

Using data from the China Institute for Educational Finance Research-Household Survey and China Household Finance Survey in 2015 and 2017, we examine the relationship between income inequality and expenditures on shadow education. Our results suggest that greater income inequality constrains shadow education expenditure. However, this effect is only significant among the lower social class. Mechanism analysis reveals that income inequality may influence shadow education expenditure through educational expectations, perceptions of fair opportunities, credit constraints, and social networks. Our conclusion reveals increased inequality in access to shadow education stemming from income inequality. The government should thus optimize policies for the distribution of secondary and tertiary education to reduce income inequality and encourage low-income families to value their children's education. This conclusion would help bridge the gap in access to education resources and outcomes among students with different income levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Gong, Yuexuan & Xue, Haiping & Chen, Tao, 2025. "Income inequality and shadow education in China: From the perspective of social stratification," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000847
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000847
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:92:y:2025:i:c:s1043951x25000847. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.