IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v508y2026ics0096300325003492.html

Intergroup-based public goods games in complex networks with leader-driven other-regarding preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Hao
  • Cui, Weicheng

Abstract

Conventional evolutionary game models often assume that individuals act only to maximize personal payoffs, yet experimental evidence reveals that many participants display other-regarding preferences (ORP). In this paper, we investigate the evolution of cooperation in Public Goods Games (PGG) on complex networks, incorporating the influence of leader ORP. Traditional PGG models primarily focus on individual-level strategies and often neglect the role of leaders and intergroup competition. This study addresses these gaps by proposing an intergroup-based PGG model that integrates community structure, leader identification, and ORP attenuation based on network distance. The proposed model considers multiple network topologies, including regular networks, small-world networks, random networks, and scale-free networks, to explore how leader ORP intensity, network structure, and resource competition influence group cooperation. Simulation results show that stronger leader ORP intensities significantly promote cooperation, particularly in groups with high ORP and in networks with short average path length. We also demonstrate that social temperature in resource allocation, decay rates of leader ORP, and rewiring probabilities play crucial roles in the evolution of cooperation. Our results provide new insights into collective behavior evolution in social networks, highlighting the importance of leader influence and network structure in fostering cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Hao & Cui, Weicheng, 2026. "Intergroup-based public goods games in complex networks with leader-driven other-regarding preferences," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:508:y:2026:i:c:s0096300325003492
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2025.129623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300325003492
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2025.129623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weimann, Joachim, 1994. "Individual behaviour in a free riding experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 185-200, June.
    2. Shumei Wang & Yaoqun Xu, 2022. "Complex Network-Based Evolutionary Game for Knowledge Transfer of Social E-Commerce Platform Enterprise’s Operation Team under Strategy Imitation Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-34, November.
    3. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    4. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Alexander Peterhansl & Peter S. Dodds & Duncan J. Watts, 2007. "Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(7), pages 1036-1050, July.
    5. Bo, Xianyu, 2010. "Other-regarding preference and the evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma on complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(5), pages 1105-1114.
    6. Chaoqian Wang & Matjaž Perc & Attila Szolnoki, 2024. "Evolutionary dynamics of any multiplayer game on regular graphs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Tavoni, Alessandro & Dannenberg, Astrid & Kallis, Giorgos & Löschel, Andreas, 2011. "Inequality, communication and the avoidance of disastrous climate change," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 37570, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Lu, Kun & Wu, Bin & Li, Ming-chu & Wang, Zhen, 2014. "Other-regarding preference causing ping-pong effect in self-questioning game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-58.
    9. Wang, Xianjia & Yang, Zhipeng & Chen, Guici & Liu, Yanli, 2024. "Enhancing cooperative evolution in spatial public goods game by particle swarm optimization based on exploration and q-learning," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    10. Jicun Zhang & Jiyou Fei & Xueping Song & Jiawei Feng, 2021. "An Improved Louvain Algorithm for Community Detection," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-14, November.
    11. Zhang, Qianwei & Tang, Rui & Lu, Yilun & Wang, Xinyu, 2024. "The impact of anxiety on cooperative behavior: A network evolutionary game theory approach," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 474(C).
    12. Valerio Capraro & Joseph Y. Halpern & Matjaž Perc, 2024. "From Outcome-Based to Language-Based Preferences," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 115-154, March.
    13. Guangrong Wang & Jianbiao Li & Wenhua Wang & Xiaofei Niu & Yue Wang, 2024. "Confusion cannot explain cooperative behavior in public goods games," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121(10), pages 2310109121-, March.
    14. Flores, Lucas S. & Han, The Anh, 2024. "Evolution of commitment in the spatial public goods game through institutional incentives," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    15. repec:fth:iniesr:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Wang, Pai & Yang, Zhihu, 2024. "The double-edged sword effect of conformity on cooperation in spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Games with reinforcement learning," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Simon Gachter & Ernst Fehr, 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 980-994, September.
    18. Liming Zhang & Ming Cai & Yingxin Zhang & Shuai Wang & Yao Xiao, 2024. "Two-layer network evolutionary game model applied to complex systems," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Blanco, Mariana & Engelmann, Dirk & Normann, Hans Theo, 2011. "A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 321-338, June.
    20. Wang, Zhen & Du, Wen-Bo & Cao, Xian-Bin & Zhang, Lian-Zhong, 2011. "Integrating neighborhoods in the evaluation of fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(7), pages 1234-1239.
    21. Wang, Chaoqian & Huang, Chaochao & Pan, Qiuhui & He, Mingfeng, 2022. "Modeling the social dilemma of involution on a square lattice," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    22. Chen, Hao & Li, Weikun & Cui, Weicheng, 2025. "Eeffects of other-regarding preferences on cooperation in networked Prisoner’s Dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    23. Mohammad Salahshour, 2021. "Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, February.
    24. Jiawei Wang & Liming Zhang & Haihong Li & Qionglin Dai & Junzhong Yang, 2023. "Inequality-induced emotions might promote cooperation in evolutionary games," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 96(3), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yao, Jingjing & Li, Dandan, 2025. "Evolutionary game analysis of individual behaviors with reputation-driven dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1).
    2. Li, Xiaopeng & Guo, Shiyao & Li, Dongdong & Lin, Zhimin, 2026. "The evolution of cooperation shaped by asymmetric link-weight integration capabilities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 202(P2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Hao & Li, Weikun & Cui, Weicheng, 2025. "Eeffects of other-regarding preferences on cooperation in networked Prisoner’s Dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Xie, Kai & Szolnoki, Attila, 2025. "Reputation in public goods cooperation under double Q-learning protocol," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Kurt A. Ackermann & Ryan O. Murphy, 2019. "Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, March.
    4. Kang, Hongwei & Jiang, Chao & Shen, Yong & Sun, Xingping & Chen, Qingyi, 2025. "Neighbor-aware reinforcement learning fosters cooperation in spatial public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P3).
    5. Gabriele Camera & Cary Deck & David Porter, 2020. "Do economic inequalities affect long-run cooperation and prosperity?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(1), pages 53-83, March.
    6. Fangfang Tan, 2008. "Punishment in a Linear Public Good Game with Productivity Heterogeneity," De Economist, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 269-293, September.
    7. Bruno S. Frey & Stephan Meier, "undated". "Pro-Social Behavior, Reciprocity or Both?," IEW - Working Papers 107, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    8. Sabrina Teyssier, 2012. "Inequity and risk aversion in sequential public good games," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 91-119, April.
    9. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gaechter, 2008. "Heterogeneous Social Preferences And The Dynamics Of Free Riding In Public Good Experiments," Discussion Papers 2008-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    10. Urs Fischbacher & Simon Gachter, 2010. "Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 541-556, March.
    11. Müller, Stephan, 2014. "The evolution of inequality aversion in a simplified game of life," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 219, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    12. Khadjavi, Menusch & Lange, Andreas & Nicklisch, Andreas, 2014. "The Social Value of Transparency and Accountability: Experimental Evidence from Asymmetric Public Good Games," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100512, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Sun, Xingping & Feng, Kaiyu & Kang, Hongwei & Shen, Yong & Chen, Qingyi, 2026. "Adaptive migration guided by reputation-pheromone dynamics in spatial games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 202(P1).
    14. Yang, Luhe & Ning, Yongpeng & Zhang, Lianzhong, 2025. "Reconstruction of micro-dynamics characterizing human decision-making behavior in repeated social dilemmas," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 497(C).
    15. Ockenfels, Axel & Gallier, Carlo & Sturm, Bodo, 2024. "More frequent commitments promote cooperation, ratcheting does not," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-065, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Zhang, Mengshu & Ren, Tianyu & Zeng, Xiao-Jun & Li, Jia, 2024. "Promoting cooperation through dynamic trustworthiness in spatial public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 479(C).
    17. Xu, Xue, 2018. "Experiments on cooperation, institutions, and social preferences," Other publications TiSEM d3cf4dba-b0f3-4643-a267-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Gangadharan, Lata & Nikiforakis, Nikos & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2017. "Normative conflict and the limits of self-governance in heterogeneous populations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-156.
    19. Nikiforakis, Nikos, 2010. "Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 689-702, March.
    20. Xiang Wei & Peng Xu & Shuiting Du & Guanghui Yan & Huayan Pei, 2021. "Reputational preference-based payoff punishment promotes cooperation in spatial social dilemmas," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(10), pages 1-7, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:508:y:2026:i:c:s0096300325003492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.