IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v333y2018icp467-479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Still wrong use of pairings in cryptography

Author

Listed:
  • Uzunkol, Osmanbey
  • Kiraz, Mehmet Sabır

Abstract

Recently many pairing-based cryptographic protocols have been designed with a wide variety of new novel applications including the ones in the emerging technologies like cloud computing, internet of things (IoT), e-health systems, and wearable technologies. There have been, however, a wide range of incorrect use of these primitives mainly because of their use in a “black-box” manner. Some new attacks on the discrete logarithm problem lead to either totally insecure or highly inefficient pairing-based protocols, and extend considerably the issues related to pairings originally pointed out by Galbraith et al. (2008). Other reasons are the implementation attacks, the minimal embedding field attacks, and the issues due to the existence of auxiliary inputs. Although almost all these issues are well-known to mathematical cryptographers, there is no state-of-the-art assessment covering all these new issues which could be used by the applied cryptography researchers and the IT-security developers. In order to illustrate this point, we give a list of recent papers having either wrong security assumptions or realizability/efficiency issues. Furthermore, we give a compact and an state-of-the-art recipe of the correct use of pairings for the correct design with a view towards efficient and secure implementation of security solutions using these primitives.

Suggested Citation

  • Uzunkol, Osmanbey & Kiraz, Mehmet Sabır, 2018. "Still wrong use of pairings in cryptography," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 333(C), pages 467-479.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:333:y:2018:i:c:p:467-479
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300318302352
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:333:y:2018:i:c:p:467-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.