Author
Listed:
- Michela Luzi
(Niccolò Cusano University, Rome, Italy)
- Marxiano Melotti
(Niccolò Cusano University, Rome, Italy)
- Laura Guercio
(Niccolò Cusano University, Rome, Italy)
Abstract
This article examines the gap between objective and subjective security in Terni (Umbria, Italy) in the light of the current debates on risk society, moral panics and the culture of fear. Using the methodology worked out by Niccolò Cusano University (2023-2025), mixing deep analysis of the available data, surveys, interviews and direct observation, it points out that, in spite of the declining of criminal activities after the recent pandemic period, the fear of crime remains high, though unevenly distributed. Qualitative findings attribute the persistence of fear to: (1) environmental outbreaks of disorder; (2) their amplification by mass media and social media, which increases their perception; (3) low trust in institutions, which incresases the demand for visible police control; and (4) advanced marginality, which erodes social cohesion. Private video surveillance is widely accepted, but it helps increase concerns about security. The authors advocate a participatory model of security integrating municipal police, urban regeneration, youth engagement and the use of digital tools with safeguards against exclusion and vigilantism. Their recommendations include clear and objective reporting of crime data, media literacy initiatives, improved public lighting and intersectoral coordination between police activities, social services, housing and education. Terni’s experience shows how aligning objective security with its perceived need requires interventions addressed to structural inequalities and institutional trust, which could offer good lessons to other medium-sized European cities undergoing post-indusrial change.
Suggested Citation
Michela Luzi & Marxiano Melotti & Laura Guercio, 2025.
" Security and Perceived Security in Terni: A Sociological Analysis,"
Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 9(2), pages 27-48, December.
Handle:
RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:27-48
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
- K15 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Civil Law; Common Law
- K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
- K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:27-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serban Ionut (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ispedur.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.