IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edr/sswrgl/v7y2023i2p6-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healing Voices: A Deep Dive into Doctor Perceptions on relation between Malpractice and Medical Legislation and Healthcare system in Romania. The results of a qualitative sociological research

Author

Listed:
  • Radu-Mihai Dumitrescu

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Nicolae-Dan

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Corina Ilinca

    (University of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This article presents findings from a comprehensive survey titled “Dimensions of Malpractice in Romania” addressing the negative aspects of the current legislation on professional liability. The data reveals a notable gap in doctors' knowledge of the legislative framework specific to the medical profession, emphasizing a high demand for formal, institutional training. The prevalence of "I don't know" responses suggests a conceptual gap, possibly stemming from ultra-specialized training that lacks trans disciplinary education, particularly in legal matters. Medical malpractice emerges as a significant challenge for both the healthcare system and society at large. This survey delves into the complex social context of medical practice, exploring individual experiences and social influences. The large participant pool (8,121 participants, with 4,729 responses) enhances the research's scalability, allowing for the identification of prevalent themes and subsequent correlations through advanced statistical methods. The study, conducted through a questionnaire administered within a month to over 8,000 participants, highlights the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of survey research compared to interview-based approaches. Despite its advantages, the qualitative nature of the study presents limitations, such as the potential subjectivity in data interpretation. Limitations include the potential lack of generalizability, leading to the organization of data based on frequency rather than broad applicability. The findings may be more relevant for specific contexts, requiring further evaluations and independent assessments. This qualitative sociological research prioritizes an in-depth understanding of phenomena over quantitative aspects. The identified themes and sub-themes reflect negative conditions and vulnerabilities in medical practice, serving as a basis for potential amendments to legal texts. A legislative framework adapted to local social conditions is proposed to benefit both the healthcare system and broader society. The article concludes with a call for continued research, emphasizing the importance of refining the legislative framework to enhance the overall healthcare landscape in Romania..

Suggested Citation

  • Radu-Mihai Dumitrescu & Adrian Nicolae-Dan & Corina Ilinca, 2023. "Healing Voices: A Deep Dive into Doctor Perceptions on relation between Malpractice and Medical Legislation and Healthcare system in Romania. The results of a qualitative sociological research," Sociology and Social Work Review, International Society for projects in Education and Research, vol. 7(2), pages 6-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:6-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://globalresearchpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Healing-Voices.The-results-of-a-qualitative-sociological-research-.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Malpractice; Doctor perceptions; Medical legislation; Healthcare system.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edr:sswrgl:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:6-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serban Ionut (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ispedur.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.