A comparison of autoregressive distributed lag and dynamic OLS cointegration estimators in the case of a serially correlated cointegration error
This paper deals with a family of parametric, single-equation cointegration estimators that arise in the context of the autoregressive distributed lag (ADL) models. We particularly focus on a subclass of the ADL models, those that do not involve lagged values of the dependent variable, referred to as augmented static (AS) models. The general ADL and the restricted AS models give rise to the ADL and dynamic OLS (DOLS) estimators, respectively. The relative performance of these estimators is assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations in the context of a triangular data generation process (DGP) where the cointegration error and the error that drives the regressor follow a VAR(1) process. The results suggest that ADL fares consistently better than DOLS, both in terms of estimation precision and reliability of statistical inferences. This is due to the fact that DOLS, as opposed to ADL, does not fully correct for the second-order asymptotic bias effects of cointegration, since a "truncation bias" always remains. As a result, the performance of DOLS approaches that of ADL, as the number of lagged values of the first difference of the regressor in the AS model increases. Another set of Monte Carlo simulations suggests that the commonly used information criteria select the correct order of the ADL model quite frequently, thus making the employment of ADL over DOLS quite appealing and feasible. Additional results suggest that ADL re-emerges as the optimal estimator within a wider class of asymptotically efficient estimators including, apart from DOLS, the semiparametric fully modified least squares (FMLS) estimator of Phillips and Hansen (1990, Review of Economic Studies 57, 99--125), the non-linear parametric estimator (PL) of Phillips and Loretan (1991, Review of Economic Studies 58, 407--36) and the system-based maximum likelihood estimator (JOH) of Johansen (1991, Econometrica 59, 1551--80). All the aforementioned results are robust to alternative models for the error term, such as vector autoregressions of higher order, or vector moving average processes. Copyright Royal Economic Socciety 2004
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 7 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 2 Dean Trench Street, Westminster, SW1P 3HE|
Phone: +44 20 3137 6301
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.ectj.org|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:7:y:2004:i:2:p:585-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.