IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2020-04-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Five Kaizen Success Measurements through Employees Work Improvement and its Effects on Overall Work and Quality of Services: Empirical Study of Insurance Companies in Jordan

Author

Listed:
  • Majd Omoush

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business, Tafila Technical University, Jordan Zarqa, Jordan,)

  • Monira Moflih

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Money and Finance, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Jordan.)

  • Reem Almetrami

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Money and Finance, The World Islamic Sciences and Education University, Jordan.)

Abstract

The study aimed to understand the impact of the five Kaizen success measurements (Organizational Policy and Awareness, Education and training, Cultural factors, Internal processes assessment and recognition) on the overall quality of work and the quality through by Employees Work Improvement as mediated factor on Insurance Companies in Amman. The study used a questionnaire to gather data from distributed on the 300 employees used random sample was applied to the population of this study consisting of all executives, department managers and employees of the Insurance Companies in Amman, Jordan. The questionnaire consists of three sections. Least Square-Structure Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) program was chosen and used in this study in an effort to examine and test the data associated with the hypotheses. The results show Kaizen methods positively effect on the employee work improvement of the companies of. The kaizen implement employee work improvement positively effect on overall work and quality of service, Kaizen implementation positively affects overall work and quality of service, Employee work improvement on overall work and quality of service is partially mediated between kaizen implementation and on overall work and quality of service of Insurance companies in Jordan. Additionally, small companies can use Kaizen to enhance the overall work with low cost compared to other methods of improvement, which can be of a high cost that small companies cannot afford.

Suggested Citation

  • Majd Omoush & Monira Moflih & Reem Almetrami, 2020. "Evaluating the Five Kaizen Success Measurements through Employees Work Improvement and its Effects on Overall Work and Quality of Services: Empirical Study of Insurance Companies in Jordan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 43-52.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2020-04-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/9994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/9994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Majd Mohammad Omoush, 2020. "Lean Six Sigma effect on the Quality of the Products in Jordanian Food Companies: The Moderating Role of the Manufacturing Process," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12.
    2. Saddam Ali Shatnawi & Bilal Khalaf Sakarneh, 2021. "Effect of Covid-19 in Jordan: Conceptual Analysis of Different Economic Sectors," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 266-278, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Kaizen implementation; Education and training; Cultural factors; Employees work improvement; Overall work and quality of services; Insurance Companies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • P36 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Consumer Economics; Health; Education and Training; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2020-04-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.