IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v16y2026i4id24120.html

Price Guarantee and Risk Game: A Study on Bidding Decision-Making Mechanism of Newly Added Renewable Energy Projects under the Reform of New Energy Feed-in Tariffs- Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuelin, Cao

    (China Energy Engineering Group, Guangxi Electric Power Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China.)

  • Hongjuan, Tang

    (China Energy Engineering Group, Guangxi Electric Power Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China.)

  • Wei, Zheng

    (China Energy Engineering Group, Guangxi Electric Power Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China.)

  • Jing, Fu

    (China Energy Engineering Group, Guangxi Electric Power Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China.)

  • Hongyu, Li

    (China Energy Engineering Group, Guangxi Electric Power Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China.)

  • Yuchen, Wei

    (China Energy Engineering Group, Guangxi Electric Power Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., China.)

Abstract

To advance the market-oriented reform of renewable energy feed-in tariffs and ensure a smooth policy transition, China has launched a dedicated pricing settlement mechanism. Combined with market-based power transactions, this mechanism establishes a dual decision-making framework for power producers to optimize electricity allocation and operating revenue. Based on the risk-return trade-off theory, this paper constructs a decision analysis framework for the bidding activities of newly added renewable energy projects and explores the internal operating logic of relevant decision mechanisms. The results show that enterprises need to dynamically balance policy-guaranteed returns and market-oriented risk-adjusted returns in decision-making. The core influencing factors include the gap between regulated electricity prices and expected market prices, corporate risk preference, and market price volatility. When regulated prices bring considerably higher certain returns than market expectations, it is optimal for enterprises to allocate a large proportion of power volume to the regulated channel. When regulated prices are roughly equal to expected market prices, risk-averse enterprises can allocate part of power volume to the regulated channel to hedge risks and stabilize revenue. When the market presents obvious profit premiums and enterprises have strong risk tolerance, expanding the share of market transactions will help maximize total revenue. This study provides theoretical support for renewable energy power producers to design rational bidding strategies and balance revenue security and development goals amid policy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuelin, Cao & Hongjuan, Tang & Wei, Zheng & Jing, Fu & Hongyu, Li & Yuchen, Wei, 2026. "Price Guarantee and Risk Game: A Study on Bidding Decision-Making Mechanism of Newly Added Renewable Energy Projects under the Reform of New Energy Feed-in Tariffs- Evidence from China," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 16(4), pages 78-82, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:4:id:24120
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.24120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/24120/10270
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.24120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:4:id:24120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.