Author
Listed:
- Goncalves, Clarissa Petrachini
(Department of Electrical Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.)
- Ramos, Dorel Soares
(Department of Electrical Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.)
Abstract
The ongoing energy transition is increasing the share of renewable energy sources in electricity systems, raising concerns about resource adequacy and long-term investment incentives. Given the intermittent nature of renewable generation, investors face significant uncertainty related to electricity prices and production variability, which may influence investment timing and portfolio composition. In several liberalized electricity markets, capacity mechanisms have been introduced to mitigate these risks and ensure sufficient generation capacity. This paper evaluates how capacity payments and portfolio complementarities between renewable sources influence investment decisions under uncertainty. A real options analysis (ROA) framework is developed to model the option to defer investments in hydropower, wind power and combined hydro-wind portfolios. The model incorporates uncertainties related to electricity prices and generation output and is implemented using a binomial lattice approach with consolidated volatility estimates. The methodology is applied to the Brazilian electricity market (BEM), which is undergoing a liberalization process and preparing new capacity auctions. Results show that complementarities between hydropower and wind generation reduce investment risk and lower the option value of waiting. Diversified renewable portfolios allow investors to participate more competitively in capacity auctions while remaining resilient to market volatility, improving the effectiveness of capacity remuneration mechanisms.
Suggested Citation
Goncalves, Clarissa Petrachini & Ramos, Dorel Soares, 2026.
"Capacity Payments and Renewable Portfolio Investments: A Real Options Approach,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 16(4), pages 1-9, July.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:4:id:23625
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.23625
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:4:id:23625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.