IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v16y2026i2id23078.html

Digital Green Finance, FinTech Innovation, and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Global Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Perera, Vidura

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Wasantha, Neel

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Dissanayake, Tharindu

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Bandara, Aruna Ishara

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Gunasena, Daham

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Kumara, Nuwan Pushpa

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Jayawickrama, Sanjeewa

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Madurapperuma, Wasanthi

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

  • Wanninayake, Bandara

    (University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.)

Abstract

Digital green finance (DGF) the combination of green financial tools with FinTech systems like blockchain-based bonds, AI-driven credit scoring, and digital disclosure platforms-has become an important way to get climate-aligned capital moving. However, its efficacy in the context of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) remains empirically insufficiently examined. This study investigates the correlation between green finance (GF) and corporate environmental performance (CEP), as well as the influence of digitalization and policy instability on this relationship. We use a balanced panel of 1,280 listed non-financial companies from nine economies (the US, the UK, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Sweden, Japan, Canada, and China) between 2012 and 2024. We use two-way fixed effects, instrumental variables (IV/2SLS), propensity score matching with difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), triple interaction models, and sectoral heterogeneity tests. We find that GF significantly improves CEP by giving companies credible decarbonization capital and making environmental disclosure stronger. This is in line with stakeholder theory and the resource-based view. However, this effect diminishes at elevated EPU levels, consistent with real options theory: policy volatility increases risk premiums and postpones irreversible green investment. Digitalization significantly enhances the GF-CEP connection and partially mitigates the dampening influence of EPU. This suggests that FinTech-facilitated transparency, traceability, and monitoring bolster the credibility and sustainability of green investment, even amid volatile policy contexts. The effect is strongest in sectors that emit a lot of pollution and are going through a lot of changes, but these sectors are also the most likely to be affected by policy uncertainty. These results show that DGF is not only a way to make things more efficient, but also a way to keep institutions stable. The research provides novel cross-national causal evidence regarding the interplay of finance, technology, and policy in shaping firms' environmental outcomes on a large scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Perera, Vidura & Wasantha, Neel & Dissanayake, Tharindu & Bandara, Aruna Ishara & Gunasena, Daham & Kumara, Nuwan Pushpa & Jayawickrama, Sanjeewa & Madurapperuma, Wasanthi & Wanninayake, Bandara, 2026. "Digital Green Finance, FinTech Innovation, and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Global Firms," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 16(2), pages 1238-1255, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:2:id:23078
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.23078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/23078/9895
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.23078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:2:id:23078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.