Author
Listed:
- Al Hazza, Muataz
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Computing, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE,)
- Sakhrieh, Lana
(School of Science, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, CV1 5FB Coventry, United Kingdom,)
- Farhat, Maissa
(Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, School of Engineering and Computing, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, P.O. Box 10021 Ras Al Khaimah, UAE.)
- Sakhrieh, Ahmad
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Computing, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE,)
Abstract
As energy demand increases daily due to economic growth and population expansion, smart grid technology has emerged as an essential innovation for modern power systems. These grids integrate digital technologies, enabling real-time monitoring, control, and enhanced energy efficiency. However, deploying smart grids faces significant challenges, including cybersecurity threats, data privacy concerns, power theft, and communication infrastructure issues. This study prioritizes these challenges using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP results highlight the varying contributions of factors to smart grid risks. Cybersecurity emerges as the most critical factor (49.9%), emphasizing its role in preventing disruptions. Power theft (23.1%) significantly impacts economic and operational aspects, while data security and privacy (20%) underscore the need for robust safeguards. Communication infrastructure issues (7%) affect operations, and battery failure is identified as the least critical risk. A consistency check confirms the reliability of judgments with a Consistency Ratio (CR) below 10%. These findings help prioritize and mitigate risks effectively in smart grid systems.
Suggested Citation
Al Hazza, Muataz & Sakhrieh, Lana & Farhat, Maissa & Sakhrieh, Ahmad, 2026.
"Prioritizing Risks and Challenges in Smart Grid Implementation: An Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 16(2), pages 1113-1119, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:2:id:22938
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.22938
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:2:id:22938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.