Author
Listed:
- Gülcü, Yunus
(Firat University, Elazig, Turkiye,)
- Özek, Yavuz
(Firat University, Elazig, Turkiye,)
- Bayat, Tayfur
(Inonu University, Malatya, Turkiye.)
- Çanakçi, Burak
(Firat University, Elazig, Turkiye,)
Abstract
Climate change and sustainable development goals make green energy (the development of environmentally related technologies) the main determinant of economic growth in the Fragile Five economies. In this study, the determinants of green innovation in the Fragile Five economies (Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Turkey) during the period 2002-2020 are examined through panel data analysis. The empirical findings show that in the short run, increases in output encourage demand-driven innovation. In the long run, however, fixed capital investments, the stringency of environmental policies, and the level of human capital are indicated to be effective on green innovation. While in India, income growth and fixed capital investments feed innovation, in the Turkish economy, energy efficiency and renewable energy investments provide support. In Indonesia and South Africa, human capital strengthens the capacity for knowledge absorption and supports innovation. In Brazil, on the other hand, due to income growth being directed towards traditional energy-intensive sectors, the green innovation process slows down. According to the empirical findings, the stringency of environmental policies may suppress green innovation in the short term by increasing compliance costs, but in the long term, in line with the Porter hypothesis, it may stimulate green innovation. For these reasons, in the Fragile Five economies, it is necessary to direct physical capital toward green technologies through green financing instruments and to reduce firms' compliance costs with predictable environmental policies.
Suggested Citation
Gülcü, Yunus & Özek, Yavuz & Bayat, Tayfur & Çanakçi, Burak, 2026.
"From Energy to Information: Green Knowledge Production Function in Fragile Five Economies,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 16(2), pages 119-128, January.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:2:id:21885
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.21885
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2026:i:2:id:21885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.