Author
Listed:
- Adejayan, Adeola Oluwakemi
(School of Commerce, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa)
- Doorasamy, Mishelle
(School of Commerce, College of Law and Management Studies, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa)
Abstract
Most small businesses avoid the implementation of environmental accounting practices due to cost implications albeit may affect the impact of green initiatives on the financial performances of small businesses. Hence, this study investigates the moderating role of environmental management accounting practices (EMAP) on the relationship between green financing and financial performance of 10 manufacturing and export oriented small caps in South Africa from 2015 to 2024. ROA is employed as the proxy for financial performance while Green Capex and Environmental accounting disclosures are the predicting and intervening variables respectively. Using Driscoll and Kraay standard error panel regression, the results show that green finance has negative and significant effect on Return on Asset (ROA). Also, the moderating role of Environmental Management Accounting Practices strengthens the impact of green finance on ROA, though with non-significant effect. The study concludes that EMAP improves the financial performance of SMEs with green initiatives. More so, green initiatives alone are not sufficient to bolster financial performance of small businesses without incorporating environmental practices. Hence, its recommended that small businesses in South Africa should integrate the use of Environmental accounting practices in their operations that aligns with financial objectives by employing standardized EMAP tools that would assist them to monitor, quantify and assess environmental cost.
Suggested Citation
Adejayan, Adeola Oluwakemi & Doorasamy, Mishelle, 2025.
"Green Financing and SMES Performance in South Africa: Role of Environmental Management Accounting Practice,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 16(1), pages 472-480, December.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2025:i:1:id:20763
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.20763
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:16:y:2025:i:1:id:20763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.