Author
Listed:
- Asati, Parul
(Research Scholar, Amity University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India)
- Nathani, Navita
(Amity University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India)
- Berwal, Kavita
(New Delhi Institute of Management, India)
- Hassan, Arif
(Amity University, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India)
- Raghuwanshi, Sandeep
(Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India)
Abstract
The study investigates the intention of future business leaders to adopt electric vehicles (EVs). A survey of 248 business leaders found that environmental concern is the strongest predictor of EV adoption as a mediator. Structural Equation Model (SEM) was used to investigate the determinants of EV adoption, focusing on perceived benefits, social influence, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, environmental concerns, and electric vehicle adoption. The study suggests that EV marketers should promote environmental awareness in future business leaders' mindsets to drive long-term behavioural change. Strategies that enhance public understanding of environmental issues, improve perceived ease of use, and emphasize the practical and social benefits of EVs are essential for accelerating the transition to sustainable transport systems. Additionally, out of four, three determinants significantly influenced environmental concerns, while one determinant, like perceived benefit, is insignificant. Environmental concerns are crucial in shaping consumer behaviour towards electric mobility. The research contributes to the theoretical development of the electric vehicle adoption model in green technology contexts and offers actionable insights for marketing strategists and public policymakers aiming to promote widespread electric vehicle acceptance among consumers.
Suggested Citation
Asati, Parul & Nathani, Navita & Berwal, Kavita & Hassan, Arif & Raghuwanshi, Sandeep, 2025.
"The Role of Green Consumer Behavior in Shaping Electric Vehicle Adoption Among Future Business Leaders,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(6), pages 287-294, October.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:6:id:20780
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.20780
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:6:id:20780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.