IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v15y2025i4id20348.html

Navigating the Renewable Energy Transition: A Systematic Review of Economic and Policy Strategies for Grid Integration, Stability, and Viability

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Nohman

    (Strategic Research Institute, Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Technology Park Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

  • Qureshi, Muhammad Imran

    (Teesside University International Business School, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BX, United Kingdom)

  • Falahat, Mohammad

    (Strategic Research Institute, Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Technology Park Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

  • Sikandar, Huma

    (Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Bt Sham, Rohana

    (Strategic Research Institute, Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Technology Park Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

Abstract

Despite extensive research on renewable energy technologies and grid systems, a critical gap persists in understanding the integrated economic and policy frameworks necessary for cost-effective, stable grid operation with high renewable penetration. Current literature remains fragmented across disciplinary boundaries, preventing cohesive strategies that balance technical requirements with economic sustainability. This systematic review synthesizes economic and policy strategies for successful renewable energy integration by examining the intersection between technical challenges, economic viability, and policy framework effectiveness. A multistage analysis adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines combined systematic review methodology with bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and Structural Topic Modeling using R. Comprehensive Scopus database search yielded 507 initial documents, systematically filtered to 142 high-quality studies spanning 2014-2024. Bibliometric analysis revealed a decisive shift from technical integration focus (80% in 2014) toward market design and policy frameworks (60% by 2024). Structural Topic Modeling identified three themes: Renewable Energy Integration (37%), Electricity Market Design and Policy (33%), and Energy Storage and Grid Flexibility (30%). Analysis demonstrates successful transitions require technology-specific support mechanisms, market designs compensating flexibility resources for multiple grid services, and adaptive policy frameworks maintaining investment certainty. This research challenges prevailing assumptions about renewable energy barriers, revealing institutional innovation has become more critical than technical solutions. The findings provide the first comprehensive mapping of interdisciplinary research evolution, demonstrating fragmented approaches hinder optimal resource allocation. Future research should prioritize integrated assessment frameworks evaluating strategies across technical, economic, and policy dimensions simultaneously to support comprehensive institutional transformation required for sustainable energy transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Nohman & Qureshi, Muhammad Imran & Falahat, Mohammad & Sikandar, Huma & Bt Sham, Rohana, 2025. "Navigating the Renewable Energy Transition: A Systematic Review of Economic and Policy Strategies for Grid Integration, Stability, and Viability," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(4), pages 709-723, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:4:id:20348
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.20348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/20348/9048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.20348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:4:id:20348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.