Author
Listed:
- Taherifard, Ali
(Sobhan Institute for Energy Studies, Tehran, Iran)
- Farimani, Fazel Moridi
(Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran)
- Negin-Taji, Zarir
(Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran)
Abstract
Upstream contracts in petroleum sector may alter the behaviour of the contractor. This alteration may deviate the production path from the optimal one; this adverse effect is called distortionary effect of contracts. In this paper the distortionary effect of a risk service contract is evaluated using the data from an oil field in Middle East. The field is operated under a risk service contract signed in 2000 to increase the production by around 80,000 bbl/day. The contractual production profile (proposed by the contractor and stipulated within the contract) is compared against the estimated optimal production path over the contract life-cycle (2000-2024) and with the actual production. The optimal production path is calculated in both finite and infinite case using stochastic dynamic programming method. Results reveal that under different scenarios of discount rate, depletion rate and gas injection, the contractual production falls below the optimal production path which results in a loss of cumulative production of 5- 34% over the contract lifecycle. It is also shown that actual production is also below the optimal path and the path suggested by the contractor within the contract. It is discussed how contract time limitation affects adversely on the cumulative production of the field. Inflexibilities in contractual elements such as cap on total recoverable costs, stringent work program and upper/lower limit of production profile are discussed to be the main sources of distortion.
Suggested Citation
Taherifard, Ali & Farimani, Fazel Moridi & Negin-Taji, Zarir, 2025.
"The Efficiency of Upstream Petroleum Contracts: Risk Service Contract in Focus,"
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(4), pages 367-377, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:4:id:18363
DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.18363
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:4:id:18363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.