IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/v15y2025i3id18895.html

A Comparative Analysis of Life Cycle Costs and Emissions in Mae Sariang's Microgrid Energy Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Yathip, Bancha

    (Rattanakosin College for Sustainable Energy and Environment, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand)

  • Usapein, Parnuwat

    (Rattanakosin College for Sustainable Energy and Environment, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand)

  • Madtharad, Chakphed

    (Department of System Planning, Provincial Electricity Authority, Bangkok, Thailand)

  • Jirawongnusorn, Sirichai

    (Rattanakosin College for Sustainable Energy and Environment, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, Thailand)

Abstract

This study evaluates the life cycle costs, net present value (NPV), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of three energy scenarios for the Mae Sariang microgrid system to assess the economic and environmental impacts of different energy sources. The reliance on renewable energy has become increasingly vital in addressing energy sustainability and reducing carbon footprints. The analysis reveals that Scenario I, primarily utilizing solar energy, achieved the lowest life cycle cost per kilowatt-hour (kWh) at 6.18 and the highest NPV of 226,583,036 baht, while also producing the fewest GHG emissions at 21,239 kgCO?e/year. In contrast, Scenario II, dependent on grid electricity, incurred the highest costs and emissions at 25,180 kgCO?e/year, reflecting its reliance on higher-carbon sources. Scenario III, which incorporates diesel generation, demonstrated moderate emissions at 22,240 kgCO?e/year but resulted in a negative NPV of -2,690,330 baht due to high fuel expenses. The findings highlight that prioritizing renewable energy sources not only enhances financial viability but also minimizes environmental impact. Therefore, the study concludes that adopting a renewable-focused approach in microgrid systems offers substantial economic and ecological benefits. Policy recommendations include incentivizing renewable energy integration, promoting energy efficiency measures, and developing supportive frameworks to reduce reliance on high-carbon electricity, ultimately enhancing the feasibility and sustainability of energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yathip, Bancha & Usapein, Parnuwat & Madtharad, Chakphed & Jirawongnusorn, Sirichai, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Life Cycle Costs and Emissions in Mae Sariang's Microgrid Energy Scenarios," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 15(3), pages 328-333, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:3:id:18895
    DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.18895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/18895/8796
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijeep.18895?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:v:15:y:2025:i:3:id:18895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.