Author
Listed:
- Ehsan, Nabeel
(University of Salford, Salford, England; & Institute of Chartered Accountants of Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan.)
Abstract
This study investigates how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can improve Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance monitoring and its effect on corporate sustainability risks. Specifically, it examines the extent to which AI enhances the accuracy, timeliness, and reliability of ESG disclosures, thereby reducing sustainability risk exposure. By using a quantitative research design, data was gathered from 320 publicly listed corporations across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific between 2016 and 2024, yielding a balanced panel dataset of 2,880 firm-year observations. The study used the Generalized Least Squares (GLS) regression model to examine the relationship between AI-driven ESG compliance monitoring and corporate sustainability risks. Results indicated a highly significant negative relationship: the AI_ESG coefficient was ?6.84 (p<0.01), suggesting that a one-unit increase in AI-driven ESG monitoring adoption is associated with a 6.84-unit reduction in corporate sustainability risk, equivalent to approximately 0.53 standard deviations of the CSRISK distribution. Similarly, ESG performance scores were negatively associated with sustainability risk (coefficient = ?0.39, p<0.01). Factors such as firm size and financial leverage were also found to have significant effects on levels of sustainability risks. Robustness checks, including lagged independent variables and subsample analyses, confirmed the stability of these findings. The implications of the findings are that AI integration in ESG reporting processes represents a strategic imperative for corporations seeking alignment with evolving regulations. Policymakers are encouraged to facilitate AI adoption, particularly among smaller firms, to promote broader ESG compliance and risk management across the corporate landscape.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:16:y:2026:i:3:id:23359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.