IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/v15y2025i6id19276.html

Resilience of the Bucharest Nine Countries in the Context of Global Turbulence

Author

Listed:
  • Lebedeva, Larysa

    (Faculty of Economics, Management and Psychology, Department of Economics and Competition Policy, State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

  • Shkuropadska, Diana

    (Faculty of Economics, Management and Psychology, Department of Economics and Competition Policy, State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

  • Gonçalves, Jorge

    (Instituto Superior Técnico, Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, University of Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Shtunder, Iryna

    (Faculty of Economics, Management and Psychology, Department of Economics and Competition Policy, State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

  • Ozhelevskaya, Tatyana

    (Faculty of Economics, Management and Psychology, Department of Economics and Competition Policy, State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

  • Yasko, Yuliya

    (Faculty of Economics, Management and Psychology, Department of Economics and Competition Policy, State University of Trade and Economics, Ukraine)

Abstract

Ensuring the resilience of the Bucharest Nine (B9) countries is crucial for regional and Euro-Atlantic security, with the challenges such as Russia's aggression against Ukraine, hybrid warfare threats, regional tensions, etc. The goal of this research is to assess the resilience levels of the B9 countries and to identify aspects of their vulnerabilities and capacities to withstand global turbulence. This study analyses the Resilience Dashboards by the European Commission. The findings indicate that most B9 countries have a medium level of vulnerability, aligning with the EU27 average, while their capacity levels remain below the EU27 average. The analysis highlights that B9 countries demonstrate medium socio-economic resilience, with improvements in employment but persistent challenges in health and education with Czechia being the most resilient in this category. In green resilience, Estonia, Czechia, and Poland perform best, though still below the EU27 average, while Bulgaria and Romania face significant environmental challenges. Digital resilience shows notable positive shifts, with improvements in cybersecurity and digital skills, but challenges persist in broadband access and online public services. Estonia leads in digital resilience, while Bulgaria and Romania lag. Geopolitical resilience is at medium level. Hungary, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia have the highest geopolitical capacities, whereas Romania remains the most vulnerable.

Suggested Citation

  • Lebedeva, Larysa & Shkuropadska, Diana & Gonçalves, Jorge & Shtunder, Iryna & Ozhelevskaya, Tatyana & Yasko, Yuliya, 2025. "Resilience of the Bucharest Nine Countries in the Context of Global Turbulence," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 15(6), pages 630-643, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:6:id:19276
    DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.19276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/19276/9462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijefi.19276?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:6:id:19276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.