Author
Listed:
- Yuan, Minhua
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia; & Faculty of International Business, Anhui International Studies University, Anhui, China)
- Ab-Rahim, Rossazana
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia)
- Husaini, Dzul Hadzwan
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia)
Abstract
China is a developing country that has attracted the most foreign direct investment (FDI), making full use of the technology spillover effect. This study investigates the impacts of FDI and technology spillover on China's economic growth, focusing on its direct and indirect effects. Based on neoclassical and endogenous growth theories, FDI and technology spillover are the key variables, with trade openness, government expenditure, and total population as control variables, and economic growth as the dependent variable. This study employs a panel dataset from 30 Chinese provinces spanning 2000-2022. Methodologically, the Cross-Section Dependence test and Augmented Mean Group (AMG) model are used. Findings of direct effects confirm that research and development (R&D) and government expenditure significantly drive economic growth, while FDI and trade openness are both insignificant and negatively correlated. Indirect effects highlight R&D's significant role in the relationship between FDI and economic growth. Furthermore, there is significant heterogeneity between Eastern, Central, and Western regions. The implications of these findings are: first, fostering R&D investment is critical to magnifying the benefits of FDI and enhancing economic growth. Second, institutional innovations can attract high-quality foreign investment. Finally, aligning a high level of trade openness with growth policies is important.
Suggested Citation
Yuan, Minhua & Ab-Rahim, Rossazana & Husaini, Dzul Hadzwan, 2025.
"Does Foreign Direct Investment Foster China's Economic Growth?,"
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 15(5), pages 176-184, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:5:id:19801
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.19801
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:5:id:19801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.