IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/v15y2025i5id19189.html

Implementation of Environmental Management Accounting Practices on the Financial Performance of Wooden Furniture Manufacturing in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Pillay, Malani

    (Department of Management Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Informatics, Durban University of Technology, South Africa)

  • Msomi, Thabiso Sthembiso

    (Department of Management Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Informatics, Durban University of Technology, South Africa)

  • Aliamutu, Kansilembo

    (Department of Auditing, College of Accounting sciences, University of South Africa, South Africa)

Abstract

The research investigates the relationship between Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) practices and improving the financial performance of wooden furniture manufacturing. It responds to the increasing interest in sustainable practices within manufacturing industries and their impact on financial performance, making it relevant to those interested in sustainable business strategies and environmental accounting. The study aims to bridge the gap in understanding how EMA practices affect the financial performance of wooden furniture manufacturers. The central premise is that integrating EMA can enhance financial performance by reducing costs, improving resource efficiency, and boosting the company's reputation, thus contributing to long-term financial sustainability. We used both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and a two-step system generalization method of moments estimator in our analysis. Data was collected from 20 listed companies, resulting in 80 observations. Variables for EMA included the Environmental Investment Ratio (EIR), Environmental Expenses Ratio (EER), Natural Capital Cost (NCC), and Emissions Intensity (EMI). The data, covering the period from 2020 to 2023, was sourced from financial reports, sustainability reports, and industry publications of wooden furniture manufacturing companies. The study employs quantitative analysis techniques to assess the relationship between EMA practices and financial performance indicators such as profitability, cost savings, and resource efficiency. The results show a positive correlation between EMA implementation and financial performance. Companies adopting EMA practices reported improved profitability, significant cost reductions in waste management and resource usage, and overall enhanced financial performance compared to those not implementing these practices. This research adds to the body of knowledge by providing empirical evidence on the benefits of EMA in the manufacturing sector. It suggests that wooden furniture manufacturers can achieve financial sustainability by adopting EMA practices, which improve environmental performance and lead to better financial performance. The study also emphasizes the need for policymakers to promote the adoption of sustainable practices in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Pillay, Malani & Msomi, Thabiso Sthembiso & Aliamutu, Kansilembo, 2025. "Implementation of Environmental Management Accounting Practices on the Financial Performance of Wooden Furniture Manufacturing in South Africa," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 15(5), pages 358-366, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:5:id:19189
    DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.19189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/19189/9245
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32479/ijefi.19189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:5:id:19189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.