Author
Listed:
- Pienaar, Ruwan
(School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa)
- van Vuuren, Gary
(Centre for Business Mathematics and Informatics, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; & National Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa)
Abstract
The Mahalanobis distance (MD) is employed as a threshold for outlier identification in the construction of a blended covariance matrix, aimed at enhancing portfolio allocation and risk management during periods of elevated market volatility. During such times, sample covariance matrices often become unstable, resulting in unrealistic and unconstrained efficient frontiers. This study addresses the inadequacy of the sample covariance matrix for portfolio optimisation under turbulent conditions, where estimation errors can significantly undermine investment performance. By comparing the performance of portfolios constructed using both unaltered covariance matrices and those incorporating a blended approach informed by MD, the analysis demonstrates that the latter method substantially reduces portfolio volatility and improves risk management capabilities. The study finds that even with reduced risk, the phenomenon of an inverted efficient frontier persists during volatile periods, indicating a need for further research. Stabilised covariance matrices offer practical benefits for risk management and asset allocation in such environments. By examining the evolution of covariance matrix stability across both calm and turbulent market conditions, this research contributes to the understanding of covariance instability and highlights the value of the blended approach. The persistence of the inverted frontier underscores the enduring challenges in effective portfolio optimisation.
Suggested Citation
Pienaar, Ruwan & van Vuuren, Gary, 2025.
"Enhancing Portfolio Asset Allocation Efficiency using Blended Covariance Matrices,"
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 15(4), pages 343-355, June.
Handle:
RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:4:id:18883
DOI: 10.32479/ijefi.18883
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:v:15:y:2025:i:4:id:18883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.