IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecm/emetrp/v70y2002i5p1841-1863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimality of a Simple Market Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Mark A. Satterthwaite

    (Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, IL. U.S.A.)

  • Steven R. Williams

    (University of Illinois, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Strategic behavior in a finite market can cause inefficiency in the allocation, and market mechanisms differ in how successfully they limit this inefficiency. A method for ranking algorithms in computer science is adapted here to rank market mechanisms according to how quickly inefficiency diminishes as the size of the market increases. It is shown that trade at a single market-clearing price in the "k"-double auction is "worst-case asymptotic optimal" among all plausible mechanisms: evaluating mechanisms in their least favorable trading environments for each possible size of the market, the "k"-double auction is shown to force the worst-case inefficiency to zero at the fastest possible rate. Copyright The Econometric Society 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark A. Satterthwaite & Steven R. Williams, 2002. "The Optimality of a Simple Market Mechanism," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1841-1863, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:70:y:2002:i:5:p:1841-1863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:70:y:2002:i:5:p:1841-1863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.