IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v107y1997i442p597-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of Firms: What Difference Does Competition Make?

Author

Listed:
  • Hay, Donald A
  • Liu, Guy S

Abstract

In Cournot oligopoly, the efficiency of a firm relative to others determines its market share: this relationship gives an incentive to improve efficiency. The incentives are greater in markets where firm behavior is more competitive. Components of firm efficiency are identified by frontier production function techniques in nineteen U.K. manufacturing sectors: technical change, average efficiency of each firm relative to the frontier, and the efficiency of each firm relative to its own 'best practice' in each period. Short run declines in market shares and profits induce the firm to improve efficiency relative to its 'best practice.' Long run differences in efficiency are correlated with differences in gross investment. Copyright 1997 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Hay, Donald A & Liu, Guy S, 1997. "The Efficiency of Firms: What Difference Does Competition Make?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(442), pages 597-617, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:107:y:1997:i:442:p:597-617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199705%29107%3A442%3C597%3ATEOFWD%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    File URL: http://www.res.org.uk/datasets/vol107iss3.htm
    File Function: supporting dataset
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:107:y:1997:i:442:p:597-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.