IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v102y1992i413p754-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price, Quality and Timing of Moves in Markets with Incomplete Information: An Experimental Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Grether, David M
  • Schwartz, Alan
  • Wilde, Louis L

Abstract

This paper reports the results of theoretical and experimental analyses of search models of shopping behavior. Earlier work which dealt with markets for homogeneous goods in which sellers first determined their prices and buyers then decided upon their information acquisition (shopping) strategies conditional upon the distribution of prices showed that Nash equilibria for these markets were good predictions of outcomes of laboratory experiments. The authors extend the analysis to markets with heterogeneous goods and allow buyers and sellers to move simultaneously. The results of a series of laboratory experiments indicate that the Nash equilibria continue to be good predictions in these more realistic settings. Copyright 1992 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Grether, David M & Schwartz, Alan & Wilde, Louis L, 1992. "Price, Quality and Timing of Moves in Markets with Incomplete Information: An Experimental Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 102(413), pages 754-771, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:413:p:754-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199207%29102%3A413%3C754%3APQATOM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-3&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alan Schwartz, 2008. "How Much Irrationality Does the Market Permit?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(1), pages 131-159, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:102:y:1992:i:413:p:754-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.