IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-26-00322.html

Status competition, endogenous risk attitudes, and the insurance–lottery puzzle

Author

Listed:
  • Jimmy Teng

    (KIMEP University)

Abstract

Individuals purchase insurance while buying lottery tickets, contradicting expected utility's prediction of globally concave preferences. This paper provides a structural explanation for the coexistence of risk attitudes commonly associated with insurance purchase and lottery participation. An agent's utility combines a concave consumption component with a contest-based status component derived from the difference-form Tullock–Hirshleifer contest success function. Risk curvature is endogenous: weak agents are strictly risk-loving under re-optimization, while all agents are strictly risk-averse over background risks at fixed status expenditure, so any weak agent simultaneously exhibits both risk attitudes. This coexistence rests on irreversibility: background risks destroy assets that cannot be instantly reallocated, while lottery prizes arrive as liquid cash permitting immediate reallocation toward status expenditure. Indirect utility is globally S-shaped around an endogenously determined reference wealth level that shifts one-for-one with rival expenditure, sharing the S-shaped curvature and endogenous reference point properties of the prospect theory value function, while remaining silent on loss aversion and probability weighting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jimmy Teng, 2026. "Status competition, endogenous risk attitudes, and the insurance–lottery puzzle," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 46(3), pages 1045-1053.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-26-00322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2026/Volume46/EB-26-V46-I3-P86.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • D3 - Microeconomics - - Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-26-00322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.