IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-26-00049.html

Benford's law for collusion detection: An experimental validation

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Martínez-Sánchez

    (University of Murcia)

  • Alfonso Rosa-García

    (University of Murcia)

Abstract

Benford's Law has been widely used to detect anomalies in numerical data, including applications aimed at uncovering price manipulation and collusion, yet most applications rely on observational data in which market competitiveness is not directly controlled. This paper provides an experimental validation of Benford-based tests by exploiting exogenous variation in competition generated by a field entry experiment in rural Kenyan agricultural markets. Using transaction-level price data from Bergquist and Dinerstein (2020), we examine whether deviations from Benford's Law respond systematically to experimentally induced changes in market structure. We find that prices deviate substantially from Benford's Law in low-competition environments, and that conformity improves as competition increases. Importantly, this improvement is driven by entry of traders without prior connections to incumbents, while entry per se produces only modest changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Martínez-Sánchez & Alfonso Rosa-García, 2026. "Benford's law for collusion detection: An experimental validation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 46(2), pages 647-655.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-26-00049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2026/Volume46/EB-26-V46-I2-P56.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-26-00049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.