IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

How children affect women's labor market outcomes: estimates from using miscarriage as a natural experiment

Listed author(s):
  • Xia Li


    (School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)

Registered author(s):

    In this study, I empirically estimate the impact of children on women's labor market outcomes (such as work status, work hours and earnings). The identification in a female labor supply model where the fertility is endogenous comes from the assumption that a miscarriage – spontaneous loss of the pregnancy – occurs mostly randomly. Medical research in general provides supportive evidence for this assumption. One advantage of using the occurrence of a miscarriage to estimate the impact of children is that it allows one to estimate the impact of a first child versus no children at all, which is not possible when using other natural experiments such as twin births or the gender combination of the first two children. An instrumental variable based on the outcome of the first pregnancy is constructed and is used to estimate the coefficient of the endogenous fertility variable. The result shows that in general children have a modest negative impact on women's labor supply. It also shows that the IV estimates tend to be smaller in scale than the OLS estimates using the same data, which suggests it is indeed important to address the problem of endogenous fertility when estimating a female labor supply model.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by AccessEcon in its journal Economics Bulletin.

    Volume (Year): 32 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 2908-2920

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00364
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.