IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-12-00216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiated product and process R&D with productive efficiency asymmetries

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Duan

    (Northern Illinois University)

Abstract

This paper examines a vertically differentiated duopoly model where firms are distinguished into three dimensions: marginal cost, product quality and the level of product substitutability. I hereby replenish Zanchettin (2006) result in an enlarged parameter space context, and propose more detailed comparison between Cournot and Bertrand modes in the perspective of equilibrium price and quantity, firm and industry profits, and the corresponding aggregate social welfare. To substantiate the argument for firms' preferences in productive efficiency and the level of product substitutability, I further incorporate a two-stage product and process R&D model, in which firms are elective to choose their respective optimal R&D portfolios, and prove that the less efficient firm has stronger preference for more differentiated product, and the more efficient firm has greater incentive to expand the relative manufacturing efficiency gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Duan, 2012. "Differentiated product and process R&D with productive efficiency asymmetries," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 1-14.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2012/Volume32/EB-12-V32-I1-A14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    product differentiation; productive efficiency; product and process R&D;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.