IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebj/ijpssr/2024v3iiiia31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Gap: Aligning Teachers' Beliefs and Practices in Formative Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Sehrish Tajammul Butt
  • Dr. Almas Shoaib
  • Dr. Fauzia Naheed Khawaja

Abstract

This study aims to examine the attitudes and practices of primary school teachers towards formative assessment, with a focus on identifying demographic influences. A quantitative approach was used with the sample of 400 teachers from 16 public and private primary schools in Lahore, Pakistan. The research questions addressed the impact of demographic variables such as gender, qualification, institute type and teaching experience on teachers’ attitudes and practices towards formative assessment. Two instruments, namely Teachers Attitudes towards Formative Assessment and Teachers’ Perceived Practices towards Formative Assessment, were used to measure the constructs. The results showed generally positive attitude towards formative assessment among teachers, emphasizing their role in guiding student learning and improving teaching strategies. However, challenges such as insufficient training and time constraints for implementation were identified. Teachers’ perceived practices findings showed teachers applied some aspects consistently as compared to others. Gender and institution type findings showed significant impact of attitudes and practices, suggesting the importance of tailored support and professional development initiatives. These findings showed the need for comprehensive assessment policies and targeted interventions to promote effective formative assessment practices in primary education, ultimately enhancing student learning outcomes and fostering a culture of continuous improvement in teaching and learning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehrish Tajammul Butt & Dr. Almas Shoaib & Dr. Fauzia Naheed Khawaja, 2024. "Bridging the Gap: Aligning Teachers' Beliefs and Practices in Formative Assessment," International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), International Journal of Politics & Social Sciences Review (IJPSSR), vol. 3(III), pages 296-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebj:ijpssr:2024v3iiiia31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.ijpssr.org.pk/index.php/ijpssr/article/download/72/58/631
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebj:ijpssr:2024v3iiiia31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hazrat Bilal (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ijpssr.org.pk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.