IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/journl/vy2016ip622-633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hospital Managers' Opinions About Performance Measurement in Their Registered Hospitals: Antalya Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Nazife ÖZTÃœRK

    (Avrasya Akademi)

  • Åžerife Alev UYSAL
  • Rukiye ÇELÄ°K

Abstract

There is no one measurement can show the hospital performance with details because of the measurement of hospital performance is multi-dimensional concept and structure. Hospital performance is classified into four group as usage indicators, performance dimensions indicators, financial indicators and resource basic indicators. The aim of this study is to determine the hospital managers? views about quality, hospital, cost and financial performance in hospital. With this aim a survey was implemented to chief physician, deputy chief physician, hospital director and deputy director in 14 public hospitals and a university hospital are founded in Antalya. Study?s survey consist of 20 questions and 4 dimensions that are cost, hospital, financial and quality dimensions. Managers are in public hospitals have top average of quality dimension and managers are in university hospital have top average of hospital performance. Besides, managers are the other health staff consider important the performance than the other managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazife ÖZTÃœRK & Åžerife Alev UYSAL & Rukiye ÇELÄ°K, 2016. "Hospital Managers' Opinions About Performance Measurement in Their Registered Hospitals: Antalya Sample," Eurasian Academy Of Sciences Social Sciences Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 0, pages 622-633, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:622-633
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/73
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.soc.2016.MSEMP-50?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:journl:v::y:2016:i::p:622-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/socialsciences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.