IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/econst/v26y2025i26p33-52.html

Determining The Optimum Weekly Working Hours For Tãœrkä°Ye

Author

Listed:
  • Tuğçe BÃœLBÃœL

  • Selçuk KOÇ

Abstract

Working hours, in relation to work-life balance, employee health, and productivity, have been the subject of research in various fields, including economics, social policy, labor law, and health. Following the industrial revolution, technological advances led to a general decline in working hours, driven by a reduced need for labor and transformations in production processes. Technological advances and increased capital intensity have made production processes more efficient, making it possible to achieve the same or higher economic output (GDP) with shorter working hours. This transformation has led to the need to assess the economically optimal working hours.This study aims to determine the optimal weekly working hours at both general and sectoral levels for Türkiye by using the CES (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) production function model. The analysis was conducted using quarterly data from the 2009 - 2023 on GDP, average weekly working hours, and technology levels. The findings indicate that optimal working hours vary by sector and technology level, and that as the level of technology increases, the optimal working time decreases. In the analysis of the optimal weekly working hours that maximize GDP, it was determined that the parameters were significant in the industry and service sectors, and that in the service sector, which meets the model assumptions, the optimal weekly working time was approximately 46 hours and 32 minutes. Considering that the average weekly working time in the sector is 51 hours and 43 minutes, this resulthighlight the need for adopting efficiency-focused work policies to enhance productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuğçe BÃœLBÃœL & Selçuk KOÇ, 2026. "Determining The Optimum Weekly Working Hours For Tãœrkä°Ye," Eurasian Eononometrics, Statistics and Emprical Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 26(26), pages 33-52, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:26:y:2025:i:26:p:33-52
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.stat.2025-V25-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat/article/view/1731
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.stat.2025-V25-03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ilo:ilowps:470503 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Christopher J. Gust & Jaime R. Marquez, 2000. "Productivity developments abroad," Federal Reserve Bulletin, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), vol. 86(Oct), pages 665-681, October.
    3. Gilbert Cette & Samuel Chang & Maty Konte, 2011. "The decreasing returns on working time: an empirical analysis on panel country data," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(17), pages 1677-1682.
    4. Fagan, Colette. & Lyonette, Clare. & Smith, Mark, & Saldaña-Tejeda, Abril., 2012. "The influence of working time arrangements on work-life integration or 'balance' : a review of the international evidence," ILO Working Papers 994705033402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dongyeol Lee & Hyunjoon Lim, 2014. "Nonlinearity in Nexus between Working Hours and Productivity," Working Papers 2014-24, Economic Research Institute, Bank of Korea.
    2. Benati, Luca, 2007. "Drift and breaks in labor productivity," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 2847-2877, August.
    3. Suzan Lewis & Deirdre Anderson & Clare Lyonette & Nicola Payne & Stephen Wood, 2017. "Public sector austerity cuts in Britain and the changing discourse of work–life balance," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(4), pages 586-604, August.
    4. Ellina Samantroy & Sakshi Khurana, 2016. "Care policies and reconciliation of work and family life: experiences of women workers," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 59(3), pages 363-379, September.
    5. Susanto Basu & John G. Fernald & Nicholas Oulton & Sylaja Srinivasan, 2004. "The Case of the Missing Productivity Growth, or Does Information Technology Explain Why Productivity Accelerated in the United States but Not in the United Kingdom?," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003, Volume 18, pages 9-82, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Gilbert Cette & Jacques Mairesse & Yusuf Kocoglu, 2004. "Diffusion des TIC et croissance potentielle," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 114(1), pages 77-97.
    7. repec:ilo:ilowps:486945 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Dongyeol Lee & Hyunjoon Lim, 2017. "Multiple Thresholds In The Nexus Between Working Hours And Productivity," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 35(4), pages 716-734, October.
    9. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2016v:42i:04p:665 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Chantal Remery & Joop Schippers, 2019. "Work-Family Conflict in the European Union: The Impact of Organizational and Public Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Zhuofei Lu & Senhu Wang & Wendy Olsen, 2023. "Revisiting the ‘flexibility paradox’: degree of work schedule flexibility and time use patterns across gender and occupational groups," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Daniela Campos Ugaz, 2022. "Time precarity at work: nonstandard forms of employment and everyday life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 969-991, November.
    13. Laurence Nayman & Deniz Ünal-Kesenci, 2001. "The French-German Productivity Comparison Revisited : Ten Years after the German Unification," Working Papers 2001-14, CEPII research center.
    14. Kocziszky, György & Kincses, Áron & Jakobi, Ákos & Vinogradov, Szergej, 2025. "Az ipari termelékenység területi egyenlőtlenségei Magyarországon [Territorial disparities of industrial productivity in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1082-1108.
    15. Kevin J. Stiroh, 2002. "Information Technology and the U.S. Productivity Revival: What Do the Industry Data Say?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1559-1576, December.
    16. Gilbert Cette & Christian Pfister, 2004. "Challenges of the “New Economy” for Monetary Policy," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 8, pages 27-36, Spring.
    17. Emilia Herman & Maria-Ana Georgescu, 2012. "Is there a trade-off between employment and labour productivity in new EU member states?," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 15(45), pages 303-318, December.
    18. Susanto Basu & John G. Fernald & Nicholas Oulton & Sylaja Srinivasan, 2003. "The Case of the Missing Productivity Growth: Or, Does Information Technology Explain why Productivity Accelerated in the US but not the UK?," NBER Working Papers 10010, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Lingling Gao & Yiqun Gan & Amanda Whittal & Sonia Lippke, 2020. "Problematic Internet Use and Perceived Quality of Life: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Work-Time and Leisure-Time Internet Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Gust, Christopher & Marquez, Jaime, 2004. "International comparisons of productivity growth: the role of information technology and regulatory practices," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 33-58, February.
    21. Messenger, Jon C. & Vidal, Patricia., 2015. "The organization of working time and its effects in the health services sector : a comparative analysis of Brazil, South Africa and the Republic of Korea," ILO Working Papers 994869453402676, International Labour Organization.
    22. Ron Alquist & Menzie D. Chinn, 2002. "Productivity and the Euro-Dollar Exchange Rate Puzzle," NBER Working Papers 8824, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:26:y:2025:i:26:p:33-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.