Author
Abstract
Employees with high resilience capacity and political skills can make positive contributions to workplace culture by supporting both their individual success and the overall success of the organization. Particularly in complex and competitive work environments, understanding the effects of these factors on career satisfaction helps leaders and human resource managers make more informed decisions regarding employee development and workplace improvement plans. In this way, significant gains can be achieved in terms of both employees' personal career goals and organizational sustainability and efficiency. the aim of this study is to examine the impact of relational and operational resilience capacity and political skill on career satisfaction using the structural equation model for 515 white-collar employees. As a result of the correlation analysis, relational and operational resilience capacity was found to have a positive and significant relationship with career satisfaction at a rate of 33.1% (r=0.331, p<0.01), while political skill was found to have a positive and significant relationship with career satisfaction at a rate of 31.8% (r=0.318, p<0.01). According to the results of the structural equation model, relational and operational resilience capacity has a positive and significant effect on career satisfaction (β=0.361, p<0.01). Similarly, political skill has a positive and significant effect on career satisfaction (β=0.330, p<0.01). Thus, hypotheses H1 and H2 have been accepted. When examining the coefficient values, relational and operational resilience capacity emerged as a more influential factor on career satisfaction compared to political skill.
Suggested Citation
Burhan DASHDAMİROV & Necmiye Tülin İrge, 2026.
"The Impact Of Relational And Operational Resilience Capacity And Political Skill On Career Satisfaction,"
Eurasian Eononometrics, Statistics and Emprical Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 26(26), pages 169-186, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:econst:v:26:y:2025:i:26:p:169-186
DOI: 10.17740/eas.stat.2025-V25-09
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:26:y:2025:i:26:p:169-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.